The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Design Space for Effective Privacy Notices*
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complexity of privacy policies and their limited usefulness for end users is a known issue in privacy research.
“the complexity of privacy policies and their limited usefulness for end users is a known issue in privacy research [19]”
From "I tell him everything that I do": An investigation of privacy and safety implications of AI companion usage (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240302 · Cited by 7,832
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information
Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa1465 · Cited by 1,879
Privacy as part of the app decision-making process
Kelley, P. G., Cranor, L. F., & Sadeh, N. (2013) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466466 · Cited by 314
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms
Im, J., Dimond, J., Berton, M., Lee, U., Mustelier, K., Ackerman, M. S., & Gilbert, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445778 · Cited by 119
Robillard, J. M., Feng, T. L., Sporn, A. B., Lai, J.-A., Lo, C., Ta, M., & Nadler, R. (2019) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2019.100243 · Cited by 111
Schiffner, S., Berendt, B., Siil, T., Degeling, M., Riemann, R., Schaub, F., Wuyts, K., Attoresi, M., Gürses, S., Klabunde, A., et al. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02547-2_2 · Cited by 11
Self-citationHenriksen, A., Asadi, R., Kulyk, O., Gerdes, A., & Mayer, P. (2025) · 2025 European Symposium on Usable Security (EuroUSEC) · doi:10.1109/eurousec69254.2025.00011 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Durity, A. L., & Cranor, L. F.
- Venue
- The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 365-393
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
