The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Women and Dictionary-Making: Gender, Genre, and English Language Lexicography
Abstract
Dictionaries are a powerful genre, perceived as authoritative and objective records of the language, impervious to personal bias. But who makes dictionaries shapes both how they are constructed and how they are used. Tracing the craft of dictionary making from the fifteenth century to the present day, this book explores the vital but little-known significance of women and gender in the creation of English language dictionaries. Women worked as dictionary patrons, collaborators, readers, compilers, and critics, while gender ideologies served, at turns, to prevent, secure, and veil women's involvements and innovations in dictionary making. Combining historical, rhetorical, and feminist methods, this is a monumental recovery of six centuries of women's participation in dictionary making and a robust investigation of how the social life of the genre is influenced by the social expectations of gender.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, the over-lexicalisation of female promiscuity (Russell, 2018), hypergamy (women seeking partners of higher financial means and/or status) and the 'halo effect' have provenance and are well-documented sexist societal tropes (Ging et al., 2020; Sugiura, 2021).”
From Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok (2023) · cites this paper as Russell, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok
Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2023) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5 · Cited by 105
McConnell‐Ginet, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108641302 · Cited by 61
Neologising misogyny: Urban Dictionary’s folksonomies of sexual abuse
Ging, D., Lynn, T., & Rosati, P. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819870306 · Cited by 52
“As Lindsay Rose Russell (2018) points out, lexical reference sources have long been biased against women.”
BackgroundLanguage and Gender in the Early Modern Mediterranean
Dursteler, E. R. (2022) · Renaissance Quarterly · doi:10.1017/rqx.2021.329 · Cited by 6
Nicholls, P. J. (2019) · Feminist Modernist Studies · doi:10.1080/24692921.2019.1663090 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, L. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Lindsay Rose
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2018-08-04
- OpenAlex
- W3037138990
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 7.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- lexicography, English dictionaries, gender ideology, history of lexicography, feminist literary criticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women and Dictionary-Making: Gender, Genre, and English Language Lexicography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9781316941553
- The paper
- Russell, L. R. (2018). Women and Dictionary-Making: Gender, Genre, and English Language Lexicography. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941553