The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cambridge: Cambridge University
Abstract
Cambridge University in facts and figures: Founded in 1209 11,979 undergraduate students and 5,499 graduate students 8740 staff Budget € 924 million No other university in the world has been awarded as many Nobel Prizes as Cambridge University. Over the years no fewer than eighty scientists from the university have been presented with the ultimate recognition for their work. Trinity College alone has received the prize 31 times since the first one was awarded in 1901 – that is more than many an entire nation has managed to collect altogether. Throughout the entire nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth, the natural sciences were especially well represented at the university on the Cam. This is the place where the first electrons were glimpsed, the first atomic nuclei split, the first digital computer developed and the double helix structure of DNA discovered. Cambridge's pantheon of scientists includes greats such as Charles Darwin, Lord Kelvin, James Clark Maxwell, Lord Raleigh, James Watson, Francis Crick and Stephen Hawking. According to popular British cliché, people hoping for careers in politics and government go to Oxford, while those with scientific aspirations belong in Cambridge. Like many clichés, this one contains a kernel of truth. For instance, 25 prime ministers have been Oxford alumni, while Cambridge has produced a paltry fifteen; on the other hand Cambridge scientists have won eighty Nobel Prizes while Oxford has gathered only 47. In international surveys as well, Cambridge always finishes slightly above Oxford. Cambridge University is proud of its standing. Compared to Oxford, it strikes the visitor as being slightly more serious, perhaps even boring. The city itself is smaller, the college buildings less impressive, there are fewer tourists to be found and the pubs are rather more hidden. In general, the atmosphere in the city seems to breathe: ‘We’re hard at work.’ In spite of Cambridge's leading position in the hard sciences, it has been slow to seek income from its research. However, the ‘Cambridge Phenomenon’ has now taken over. Led by Trinity College and St John's College, a Science Park has sprung up outside the city and is continuing to grow. By the time its sixty hectares are completely built up, it will be one of the world's largest research centres.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey
Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2016) · Third World Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732 · Cited by 792
A Disease-Mediated Trophic Cascade in the Serengeti and its Implications for Ecosystem C
Holdo, R. M., Sinclair, A. R. E., Dobson, A. P., Metzger, K. L., Bolker, B. M., Ritchie, M. E., & Holt, R. D. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000210 · Cited by 298
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2022) · Computing Handbook · doi:10.1201/9780429171529-98 · Cited by 103
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. (2014) · Computing Handbook, Third Edition · doi:10.1201/b16768-7 · Cited by 103
Beaujean, A. A., & Osterlind, S. J. (2008) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.004 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Funnekotter, B.
- Venue
- Eureka!
- Publisher
- Amsterdam University Press
- Published
- 2005-06-07
- Pages
- 15-25
- OpenAlex
- W3123935820
- Cited by
- 874
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cambridge: Cambridge University. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/9789048505418.003
- The paper
- Funnekotter, B. (2005). Cambridge: Cambridge University. Eureka! https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048505418.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.