The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Efficacy and Analytical Importance of Manual Feature Extraction Using Lidar Datasets
Abstract
The availability of lidar datasets has led to several advances in archaeology, notably in the process of site prospection. Some remote sensing practitioners have aimed to create automated feature extraction (AFE) techniques that increase the efficiency and efficacy of identification and analysis. While these advances have been successful, many archaeological professionals who might have an interest in lidar-derived products do not have the technical experience to modify or create AFE techniques for particular regions or environments. Additionally, some features are not appropriate for AFE. Instead, the most widely used technique is still likely to be visually based manual feature identification. Using authors of different experience levels, we seek to evaluate the use of manual techniques for feature identification and subsequent analysis by implementing a publicly available lidar-derived digital elevation model (DEM). We demonstrate that manual feature extraction (MFE) can be accurate when more than one researcher is involved in a sort of “checks and balances” process. We also show that the use of confidence ratings can be an important part of this process if those ratings have some systematic and clearly defined underpinning. Finally, we argue, using a case study from American Samoa, that manually identified features can be analytically important as part of larger landscape studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies of remote survey note that archaeological sites located at high elevations and consisting of large geometric shapes-such as architectural structures-are much more likely to be detected than sites which lack these characteristics.
“Previous studies of remote survey note that archaeological sites located at high elevations and consisting of large geometric shapes—such as architectural structures—are much more likely to be detected than sites which lack these characteristics [54, 55].”
From Unstructured satellite survey detects up to 20% of archaeological sites in coastal valleys of southern Peru (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
One of the primary issues with manual remote survey-regardless of the type of imagery used-is inter-coder reliability.
“One of the primary issues with manual remote survey—regardless of the type of imagery used—is inter-coder reliability [55, 59].”
From Unstructured satellite survey detects up to 20% of archaeological sites in coastal valleys of southern Peru (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1002/arp.1497 · DOI
- 10.1179/2042458215Y.0000000016 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12520-014-0178-3 · DOI
- 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.339 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0305-4403(02)00271-6 · DOI
- 10.7183/0002-7316.81.2.273 · DOI
- 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.314 · DOI
- Herdrich, 1993, The Evolution and Organisation of Prehistoric Society in Polynesia, 52
- 10.1016/j.jas.2013.12.004 · DOI
- Quintus Seth J. 2011 Land Use and the Human-Environment Interaction on Olosega Island, Manu'a, American Samoa. Master's thesis, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Dakota State University, Fargo.
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0162062 · DOI
- Liu, 2011, Vegetation Mapping of American Samoa
- 10.1017/S0016756810000038 · DOI
- 10.3390/rs6098671 · DOI
- Addison David J. 2008 Report on Archaeological Test Excavations at the New Ta'u Dispensary Site. Samoa Environmental and Archaeological Consultants. Submitted to the Department of Public Works, American Samoa Government, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
- 10.1002/arp.1414 · DOI
- 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.393 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00114577 · DOI
- 10.1080/00438243.2016.1195576 · DOI
- Cleghorn, 2000, Archaeological Data Recovery Report for the Proposed Ta'u Road Reconstruction, at Faga and Fitiuta, Ta'u Island, Manu'a, American Samoa
- Clark, 1990, The Ta'u Road Archaeological Project
- 10.1016/j.jas.2016.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ancene.2016.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0003598X00114589 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jasrep.2014.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/wat2.1171 · DOI
- 10.1080/15230406.2015.1059171 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.031 · DOI
- 10.1002/arp.421 · DOI
- 10.1002/gea.20170 · DOI
- Quintus Seth J. 2015 Dynamics of Agricultural Development in Prehistoric Samoa: The Case of Ofu Island. PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Sand, 2012, Archaeology of Manono Island (Samoa): First Field Program Report
- 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2007.tb00004.x · DOI
- 10.15286/jps.121.3.275-302 · DOI
- Whistler, 1992, Botanical Inventory of the Proposed Ta'u Unit of the National Park of American Samoa
- Herdrich, 1996, A Cultural Resource Evaluation (Phase I and II) for a Portion of Road 1b, Phase I of the Ta'u Road Reconstruction Located on Ta'u Island, Manu'a, American Samoa
- Holmer, 1980, Archaeological Excavations in Western Samoa, 93
- Raber, 2012, Post-flight Aerial Acquisition and Calibration Report
- 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.033 · DOI
- 10.15184/aqy.2015.157 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jas.2012.05.029 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1205198109 · DOI
- Hunt, 1988, An Archaeological Survey of the Manu'a Islands, American Samoa, Journal of the Polynesian Society, 97, 153
- 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2012.tb00125.x · DOI
- 10.15184/aqy.2015.159 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Snyder, T. J., & Haas, R. (2024) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292272 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Quintus, S., Day, S. S., & Smith, N. J.
- Venue
- Advances in Archaeological Practice
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-364
- ISSN
- 2326-3768
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review