CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Will It Ever Be FAIR?: Making Archaeological Data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable

Nicholson, Christopher, Kansa, Sarah, Gupta, Neha, Fernandez, Rachel·2023·Advances in Archaeological Practice
DOI 10.1017/aap.2022.40
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A fundamental task of archaeology is to address challenging scientific questions related to the complexity of human societies. If we are to systematically understand the processes that affect human societies on multiple spatial and temporal scales, research leveraging existing archaeological data is essential. However, only a fraction of the data from archaeological projects are publicly findable or accessible, let alone interoperable or reusable. This is the case despite statements of disciplinary ethics, availability of capable technologies for data stewardship, publications providing guidance, and legal mandates. This article introduces the FAIR principles for data stewardship in North American archaeology, which state that data should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. We call for efforts to promote widespread adoption of the FAIR and CARE (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics) principles among professional organizations, publishers, data repositories, and researchers. We also call for adoption and implementation of requirements to adhere to these principles by governmental agencies, funding bodies, and other regulators of archaeological research. Ultimately, adoption of the FAIR principles in an ethical framework contributes to our understanding of our human experience and can lead to greater integration and reuse of research results, fostering increased partnerships between academia and industry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/aap.2022.40

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Altschul, Jeffrey H., Keith W. Kintigh, Terry H. Klein, William H. Doelle, Kelley A. Hays-Gilpin, Sarah A. Herr, Timothy A. Kohler, et al. 2017. Fostering Synthetic Research in Archaeology to Advance Science and Benefit Society. PNAS 114(42):10999-11002. https://doi:10.1073/pnas.1715950114. · DOI
  2. Altschul, Jeffrey H., Keith W. Kintigh, Terry H. Klein, William H. Doelle, Kelley A. Hays-Gilpin, Sarah A. Herr, Timothy A. Kohler, et al. 2018. Fostering Collaborative Synthetic Research in Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6(1):19-29. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2017. · DOI
  3. American Cultural Resources Association. 2019. Communication Strategy for "Promoting Synergy between the Academy and the CRM Industry." Adopted by the Board of Directors, American Cultural Resources Association, January 2019. Electronic document, https://www.digitalantiquity. org/wp-uploads/2019/03/2019-ACRA-Comm-Strategy_Promote-synergy- CRM-Academy-approved-ACRA-BoD_01-14-2019.pdf, accessed September 16, 2022. American Journal of Biological Anthropology (AJBA). 2021. Author Guidelines: Editorial Policies and Ethical Considerations. Electronic document, https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/26927691/homepage/forauthors. html, accessed September 16, 2022. · DOI
  4. Anderson, David G. 2018. Using CRM Data for "Big Picture" Research. In New Perspectives in Cultural Resource Management, edited by Francis P. McManamon, pp. 197-212. Routledge, New York.
  5. Anderson, David G., Thaddeus G. Bissett, Stephen J. Yerka, Joshua J. Wells, Eric C. Kansa, Sarah W. Kansa, Carl DeMuth, Kelsey Noack Myers, and Devin White. 2017. Climate Change and Archaeological Site Destruction: An Example from the Southeastern United States Using DINAA (Digital Index of North American Archaeology). PLoS ONE 12(11):e0188142. https:// doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188142. · DOI
  6. Anderson, David G., Joshua Wells, Stephen Yerka, Kelsey Noack Myers, Robert Carl DeMuth, and Thaddeus G. Bissett. 2015. Digital Index of North American Archaeology (DINAA). Open Context, October 15. http://open context.org/projects/416A274C-CF88-4471-3E31-93DB825E9E4A, accessed May 24, 2022. https://doi:10.6078/M7N877Q0. Archaeology Data Service (ADS) and Digital Antiquity. 2013. Caring for Digital Data in Archaeology: A Guide to Good Practice. Oxbow Books, Oxford. · DOI
  7. Atalay, Sonya. 2020. Indigenous Science for a World in Crisis. Public Archaeology 16(1-4):37-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2020. 1781492. · DOI
  8. Baerwald, Thomas J. 2010. Presidential Address: Prospects for Geography as an Interdisciplinary Discipline. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100:493-501.
  9. Berlin, Andrea M. 2020. Introducing the Levantine Ceramics Project. Journal of Hellenistic Pottery and Material Culture 5:139-147.
  10. Bird, Darcy, Lux Miranda, Marc Vander Linden, Erick Robinson, R. Kyle Bocinsky, Chris Nicholson, José M. Capriles et al. 2022. p3k14c, a Synthetic Global Database of Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates. Scientific Data 9(1):27. https://doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01118-7. · DOI
  11. Börjesson, Lisa, Olle Sköld, and Isto Huvila. 2020. Paradata in Documentation Standards and Recommendations for Digital Archaeological Visualisations. Digital Culture & Society 6(2):191-220.
  12. Clarke, Mary. 2015. The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3(4):313-330.
  13. Cook, Katherine, Canan Çakirlar, Timothy Goddard, Robert Carl DeMuth, and Joshua Wells. 2018. Teaching Open Science: Published Data and Digital Literacy in Archaeology Classrooms. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6(2):144-156. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2018. · DOI
  14. Cultural Heritage Partners. 2012. Federal Laws and Regulations Requiring Curation of Digital Archaeological Documents and Data. Office of the General Counsel and Center for Digital Antiquity, Arizona State University, Tempe. Electronic document, http://www.digitalantiquity.org/wp-uploads/ 2013/05/2013-CHP-Legal-Analysis-of-Fed-Req-for-Curation-of-Dig-Arch- Docs-Data-.pdf, accessed May 15, 2015. · DOI
  15. Davies, Neil, John Deck, Eric C Kansa, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, John Kunze, Christopher Meyer, Thomas Orrell, et al. 2021. Internet of Samples (iSamples): Toward an Interdisciplinary Cyberinfrastructure for Material Samples. GigaScience 10(5). https://doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab028. · DOI
  16. Diamond, Jared, and James A. Robinson (editors). 2010. Natural Experiments of History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  17. Douglass, John G., and Shelby A. Manney. 2020. Creative Mitigation: Alternative Strategies for Resources, Stakeholders, and the Public. Advances in Archaeological Practice 8(3):213-219. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2020. · DOI
  18. Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York. · DOI
  19. Faniel, Ixchel, Eric Kansa, Sarah Whitcher Kansa, Julianna Barrera-Gomez, and Elizabeth Yakel. 2013. The Challenges of Digging Data: A Study of Context in Archaeological Data Reuse. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 295-304. Association for Computing Machinery, New York.
  20. Faniel, Ixchel M., and Elizabeth Yakel. 2017. Practices Do Not Make Perfect: Disciplinary Data Sharing and Reuse Practices and Their Implications for Repository Data Curation. In Curating Research Data, Volume One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository, edited by Lisa R. Johnston, pp. 103-126. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago.
  21. Fernandes, Ricardo, Mark Hudson, Hiroto Takamiya, Jean-Pascal Bassino, Junzō Uchiyama, and Martine Robbeets. 2021. The ARCHIPELAGO Archaeological Isotope Database for the Japanese Islands. Journal of Open Archaeology Data 9:3. http://doi.org/10.5334/joad. · DOI
  22. Fresa, Antonella, Börje Justrell, and Claudio Prandoni. 2015. Digital Curation and Quality Standards for Memory Institutions: PREFORMA Research Project. Archival Science 2:191-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015- 9242-8. · DOI
  23. Fritsch, Bernhard. 2021. Challenges of Publishing 3D Data in Archaeology. Paper presented at the 26th International Conference on 3D Web Technology. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3485444.3507686. · DOI
  24. Gajbe, Sagar Bhimrao, Amit Tiwari, and Ranjeet Kumar Singh. 2021. Evaluation and Analysis of Data Management Plan Tools: A Parametric Approach. Information Processing & Management 58(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm. 2020.102480. · DOI
  25. Gajewski, Konrad, Sam Muñoz, Matthew Peros, André Viau, Richard Morlan, and Matthew Betts. 2011. The Canadian Archaeological Radiocarbon Database (CARD): Archaeological 14 C Dates in North America and Their Paleo- environmental Context. Radiocarbon 53(2):371-394.
  26. Gupta, Neha. 2020. Preparing Archaeological Data for Spatial Analysis. In Archaeological Spatial Analysis: A Methodological Guide, edited by Mark Gillings, Piraye Haciguzeller, and Gary Lock, pp. 17-40. Routledge, London.
  27. Gupta, Neha, Andrew Martindale, Kisha Supernant, and Michael Elvidge. 2023. The CARE Principles and the Reuse, Sharing, and Curation of Indigenous Data in Canadian Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practices 11(1):76-89.
  28. Heilen, Michael. 2020. The Role of Modeling and Synthesis in Creative Mitigation. Advances in Archaeological Practice 8(3):263-274. https:// doi:10.1017/aap.2020. · DOI
  29. Hiebel, Gerald, Gert Goldenberg, Caroline Grutsch, Klaus Hanke, and Markus Staudt. 2021. FAIR Data for Prehistoric Mining Archaeology. International Journal on Digital Libraries 22(3):267-277. https://doi:10.1007/ s00799-020-00282-8. · DOI
  30. Jones, Travis W., Robert J. Speakman, William T. Billeck, and Robert J. Hoard. 2019. A Multi-regional Obsidian Database for the Eastern Plains. Plains Anthropologist 64(250):143-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00320447.2.018.1480860. · DOI
  31. Kansa, Eric. 2009. Indigenous Heritage and the Digital Commons. In Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions and Intellectual Property Law in the Asia-Pacific Region, edited by Christoph Antons, pp. 219-244. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands.
  32. Kansa, Eric. 2012. Openness and Archaeology's Information Ecosystem. World Archaeology 44(4):498-520. https://doi:10.1080/00438243.2012.737575. · DOI
  33. Kansa, Eric C., and Sarah Whitcher Kansa. 2022. Promoting Data Quality and Reuse in Archaeology through Collaborative Identifier Practices. PNAS 119(43):e2109313118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109313118. · DOI
  34. Kansa, Eric C., Sarah W. Kansa, and Benjamin Arbuckle. 2014. Publishing and Pushing: Mixing Models for Communicating Research Data in Archaeology. International Journal of Digital Curation 9(1):57-70.
  35. Kansa, Eric C., Sarah W. Kansa, Joshua J. Wells, Stephen J. Yerka, Kelsey N. Myers, Robert C. DeMuth, Thaddeus G. Bissett, and David G. Anderson. 2018. The Digital Index of North American Archaeology: Networking Government Data to Navigate an Uncertain Future for the Past. Antiquity 92(362):490-506. https://doi:10.15184/aqy.2018. · DOI
  36. Kansa, Eric C., Jason Schultz, and Ahrash Bissell. 2005. Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Expanding Access to Scientific Data: Juxtaposing Intellectual Property Agendas via a "Some Rights Reserved" Model. International Journal of Cultural Property 12(3):285-314. https://doi:10. 1017/S0940739105050204. · DOI
  37. Kansa, Sarah W., Levent Atici, Eric C. Kansa, and Richard H. Meadow. 2019. Archaeological Analysis in the Information Age: Guidelines for Maximizing the Reach, Comprehensiveness, and Longevity of Data. Advances in Archaeological Practice 8(1):40-52. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2019. · DOI
  38. Kansa, Sarah Whitcher, and Eric C. Kansa. 2018. Data beyond the Archive in Digital Archaeology: An Introduction to the Special Section. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6(2):89-92. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2018. · DOI
  39. Kelly, Robert L., Madeline E. Mackie, Erick Robinson, Jack Meyer, Michael Berry, Matthew Boulanger, Brian F. Codding, et al. 2022. A New Radiocarbon Database for the Lower 48 States. American Antiquity 87(3):581-590. · DOI
  40. Kintigh, Keith W. 2006. The Promise and Challenge of Archaeological Data Integration. American Antiquity 71(3):567-578.
  41. Kintigh, Keith W., and Jeffrey H. Altschul. 2010. Sustaining the Digital Archaeological Record. Heritage Management 3(2):264-274.
  42. Kintigh, Keith W., Jeffrey H. Altschul, Mary C. Beaudry, Robert D. Drennan, Ann P. Kinzig, Timothy A. Kohler, W. Fredrick Limp, et al. 2014a. Grand Challenges for Archaeology. American Antiquity 79(1):5-24.
  43. Kintigh, Keith W., Jeffrey H. Altschul, Mary C. Beaudry, Robert D. Drennan, Ann P. Kinzig, Timothy A. Kohler, W. Fredrick Limp, et al. 2014b. Grand Challenges for Archaeology. PNAS 111(3):879-880. https:doi:10.1073/pnas.1324000111. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kintigh, Keith W., Jeffrey H. Altschul, Ann P. Kinzig, W. Fredrick Limp, William K. Michener, Jeremy A. Sabloff, Edward J. Hackett, Timothy A. Kohler, Bertram Ludäscher, and Clifford A. Lynch. 2015. Cultural Dynamics, Deep Time, and Data: Planning Cyberinfrastructure Investments for Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3(1):1-15. https://doi:10.7183/2326- 3768.3.1.1. · DOI
  45. Kintigh, Keith W., Katherine A. Spielmann, Adam Brin, K. Selçuk Candan, Tiffany Clark, and Matthew Peeples. 2018. Data Integration in the Service of Synthetic Research. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6(1):30-41. https:// doi:10.1017/aap.2017. · DOI
  46. Lynott, Mark J., and Alison Wylie (editors). 2000. Ethics in American Archaeology. 2nd rev. ed. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC. · DOI
  47. Marlet, Olivier, Thomas Francart, Béatrice Markhoff, and Xavier Rodier. 2019. OpenArchaeo for Usable Semantic Interoperability. Paper presented at the International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Rome, Italy. https://hal.science/hal-02389929, accessed January 31, 2023.
  48. Marwick, Ben, and Suzanne E. Pilaar Birch. 2018. A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing. Advances in Archaeological Practice 6(2):125-143. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2018. · DOI
  49. Marwick, Ben, and Li-Ying Wang. 2019. How to Align Disciplinary Ideals with Actual Practices: Transparency and Openness in Archaeological Science. SocArXiv, August 22. https://doi:10.31235/osf.io/s8z6u. · DOI
  50. McCoy, Mark D. 2017. Geospatial Big Data and Archaeology: Prospects and Problems Too Great to Ignore. Journal of Archaeological Science 84:74-94.
  51. McManamon, Francis P., and Keith W. Kintigh. 2010. Digital Antiquity: Transforming Archaeological Data into Knowledge. SAA Archaeological Record 10(2):37-40.
  52. McManamon, Francis P., Keith W. Kintigh, Leigh Anne Ellison, and Adam Brin. 2017. tDAR: A Cultural Heritage Archive for Twenty-First-Century Public Outreach, Research, and Resource Management. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5(3):238-249. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2017. · DOI
  53. Mons, Barend. 2020. Invest 5% of Research Funds in Ensuring Data Are Reusable. Nature 578:491. https//doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00505-7. · DOI
  54. Neusius, Sarah W., Bonnie W. Styles, Tanya M. Peres, Renee B. Walker, George M. Crothers, Beverley A. Smith, and Mona L. Colburn. 2019. Zooarchaeo- logical Database Preservation, Multiscalar Data Integration, and the Collaboration of the Eastern Archaic Faunal Working Group. Advances in Archaeological Practice 7(4):409-422. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2019. · DOI
  55. Nicholson, Christopher, Rachel Fernandez, and Jessica Irwin. 2021. Digital Archaeological Data in the Wild West: The Challenge of Practising Responsible Digital Data Archiving and Access in the United States. Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi:10.11141/ia.58.22. Niven, Kieron, and Francis Pierce-McManamon (editors). 2011. Archaeology Data Service / Digital Antiquity Guides to Good Practice. Electronic document, https://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/g2gpwiki/, accessed May 20, 2022. · DOI
  56. Nuninger, Laure, Rachel Opitz, Philip Verhagen, Thérèse Libourel Rouge, Clément Laplaige, Samuel Leturcq, Nathanaël Le Voguer, Catherine Fruchart, Ziga Kokalj, and Xavier Rodier. 2020. Developing FAIR Ontological Pathways: Linking Evidence of Movement in Lidar to Models of Human Behaviour. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 3(1):63-75.
  57. Plomp, Esther, Chris Stantis, Hannah F. James, Christina Cheung, Christophe Snoeck, Lisette Kootker, Arwa Kharobi, et al. 2022. The IsoArcH Initiative: Working towards an Open and Collaborative Isotope Data Culture in Bioarchaeology. Data in Brief 45:108595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022. 108595. Register of Professional Archaeologists. 2020. Code and Standards. Electronic document, https://rpanet.org/code-and-standards, accessed May 14, 2020. · DOI
  58. Research Data Alliance. 2020. FAIR Data Maturity Model: Specification and Guidelines. https://doi:10.15497/rda00050. · DOI
  59. Richards, Julian. 2017. Twenty Years Preserving Data: A View From the UK. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5(3):1-11. https://doi:10.1017/aap. 2017. · DOI
  60. Richards, Julian D., Tony Austin, and Catherine Hardman. 2010. Covering the Costs of Digital Curation. Heritage Management 3(2):255-263. https://doi. org/10.1179/hma.2010.3.2.255. · DOI
  61. Richards, Julian D., Ulf Jakobsson, David Novák, Benjamin Štular, and Holly Wright. 2021. Digital Archiving in Archaeology: The State of the Art. Introduction. Internet Archaeology 58. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.58.23. Richards, Julian D., Holly Ellen Wright, Guntram Geser, and Flavia Massara. 2022. Data Management Policies and Practices of Digital Archaeological Repositories. Internet Archaeology 59. https://doi:10.11141/ia.59.2. Robinson, Erick, Christopher Nicholson, Robert L. Kelly. 2019. The Importance of Spatial Data to Open-Access National Archaeological Databases and the Development of Paleodemography Research. Advances in Archaeological Practice 7(4):395-408. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2019.29. Role of Culture in Early Expansions of Humans. 2020. Welcome to ROCEEH. Electronic document, http://www.roceeh.net/home/, accessed March 17, 2020. · DOI
  62. Schlanger, Sarah, Signa Larralde, and Martin Stein. 2020. Long-Term Prospects for Landscape Mitigation Programs. Advances in Archaeological Practice 8(3):307-312. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2020. · DOI
  63. Schmidt, Sophie C., and Ben Marwick. 2020. Tool-Driven Revolutions in Archaeological Science. Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 3(1):18-32. · DOI
  64. Sebastian, Lynne. 2020. What Makes Some Mitigation Measures and Programs "Creative"? (And Where Does That Leave the Rest of Them?). Advances in Archaeological Practice 8(3):220-224. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2020. · DOI
  65. Simbulan, Maria. 2013. Transitioning from Data Storage to Data Curation: The Challenges Facing an Archaeological Institution. In Proceedings of the Informing Science and Information Technology Education Conference, edited by Eli Cohen and Elizabeth Boyd, pp. 1-11. Informing Science Institute, Porto, Portugal. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/114703, accessed January 5, 2023. · DOI
  66. Smith, MacKenzie, Trisha Cruse, and William Michener. 2011. Data Governance Workshop, Final Report, Arlington, VA, December 14-15, 2011. Electronic document, https://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/8/86/ Data_Governance_Workshop_Final_Report_December_2011.pdf.
  67. Snow, Dean R., Mark Gahegan, C. Lee Giles, Kenneth G. Hirth, George R. Milner, Prasenjit Mitra, and James Z. Wang. 2006. Cybertools and Archaeology. Science 311(5763):958-959.
  68. Tsosie, Krystal S., Joseph M. Yracheta, Jessica A. Kolopenuk, and Janis Geary. 2021. We Have "Gifted" Enough: Indigenous Genomic Data Sovereignty in Precision Medicine. American Journal of Bioethics 21:72-75.
  69. Vines, Timothy, Arianne Albert, Rose Andrew, Florence Debarre, Dan Bock, Michelle Franklin, Kimberly Gilbert, Jean-Sebastien Moore, Sebastien Renaut, and Diana Rennison. 2014. The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age. Current Biology 24(1):94-97. https:// doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Vines, Timothy, Rose Andrew, Dan Bock, Michelle Franklin, Kimberly Gilbert, Nolan Kane, Jean-Sebastien Moore, et al. 2013. Mandated Data Archiving Greatly Improves Access to Research Data. FASBE Journal 27(4):1304-1308. https://doi:10.1096/fj.12-218164. · DOI
  71. Walter, Maggie, Raymond Lovett, Bobby Maher, Bhiamie Williamson, Jacob Prehn, Gawaian Bodkin-Andrews, and Vanessa Lee. 2021. Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the Era of Big Data and Open Data. Australian Journal of Social Issues 56:143-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajs4.141. · DOI
  72. Welch, John R., Mark T. Altaha, Garry J. Cantley, William H. Doelle, Sarah A. Herr, Morag M. Kersel, Brandi L. MacDonald, Francis P. McManamon, Barbara Mills, and Fred Nials. 2019. Hope in Dirt: Report of the Fort Apache Workshop on Forensic Sedimentology Applications to Cultural Property Crime, 15-19 October 2018. International Journal of Cultural Property 26(2):197-210.
  73. Welch, John R., Mark Altaha, Doreen Gatewood, Karl A. Hoerig, and Ramon Riley. 2006. Archaeology, Stewardship, and Sovereignty. SAA Archaeological Record 6(4):17-20.
  74. Wells, Joshua, Eric Kansa, Sarah W. Kansa, Stephen Yerka, David G. Anderson, Thaddeus Bissett, Kelsey N. Myers, and R. Carl DeMuth. 2014. Web-Based Discovery and Integration of Archaeological Historic Properties Inventory Data: The Digital Index of North American Archaeology (DINAA). Literary and Linguistic Computing 29(3):349-360. https://doi:10.1093/llc/fqu028. · DOI
  75. Wollwage, Lance, Allyson Brooks, Rob Smith, Morgan McLemore, Annie Strader, and Kim Gant. 2020. Beyond Data Recovery: Developing Digital Information Systems for Cultural Resources in the Online Era. Advances in Archaeological Practice 8(3):253-262. https://doi:10.1017/aap.2020. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
Nicholson, C., Kansa, S., Gupta, N., & Fernandez, R.
ORCID
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Practice
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2023-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
63-75
ISSN
2326-3768
DOI
10.1017/aap.2022.40
Cited by
77
References
6
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified, 26 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review