The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein
Abstract
Presenting the history of space-time physics, from Newton to Einstein, as a philosophical development DiSalle reflects our increasing understanding of the connections between ideas of space and time and our physical knowledge. He suggests that philosophy's greatest impact on physics has come about, less by the influence of philosophical hypotheses, than by the philosophical analysis of concepts of space, time and motion, and the roles they play in our assumptions about physical objects and physical measurements. This way of thinking leads to interpretations of the work of Newton and Einstein and the connections between them. It also offers ways of looking at old questions about a priori knowledge, the physical interpretation of mathematics, and the nature of conceptual change. Understanding Space-Time will interest readers in philosophy, history and philosophy of science, and physics, as well as readers interested in the relations between physics and philosophy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524646 · Cited by 10,624
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912281589 · Cited by 5,397
Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper
Einstein, A. (1905) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19053221004 · Cited by 4,385
The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change
Kuhn, T. S. (1977) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001 · Cited by 3,861
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry.
Kramer, A. D., & Spivak, M. (1973) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2319112 · Cited by 3,445
Lehman, H. (1972) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/288419 · Cited by 2,998
From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, Second Revised Edition
Van Orman Quine, W. (1980) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1c5cx5c · Cited by 2,439
(2009) · Encyclopedia of Time: Science, Philosophy, Theology, & Culture · doi:10.4135/9781412963961.n455 · Cited by 2,421
Immanuel, I. (1998) · Felix Meiner Verlag eBooks · doi:10.28937/978-3-7873-2112-4 · Cited by 2,304
Metadata
- Authors
- DiSalle, R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006-04-27
- OpenAlex
- W1548042637
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 37.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511487361
- The paper
- DiSalle, R. (2006). Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics from Newton to Einstein. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511487361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.