Cited by 23Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychology of Development and EducationEducational and Psychological Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Growth cycles of mind and brain: analyzing developmental pathways of learning disorders

Fischer, Kurt W., Rose, L. Todd, Rose, Samuel P.·2007·Mind, Brain and Education in Reading Disorders

Abstract

Overview: Development is not a linear process, but a dynamic interaction between the individual's mind, brain, and social and physical environments. Considering learning disorders from this dynamic, situated perspective is especially important, because many of children's abilities to compensate for perceptual or cognitive difficulties are constructed from the properties of this interaction. For this reason, dynamic models hold great promise in helping us to understand development in learning disorders. They contribute powerful tools for assessing diverse developmental pathways in all their real-life complexity, without separating the individual's mind and brain from his or her environment. Furthermore, dynamic models enable us to conceptualize and measure development in terms of recurrent growth cycles, bringing assessment of children's developing minds and brains together under one framework. Research on electrical activity in the cortex demonstrates such growth cycles in brain growth, which seem to parallel the cognitive cycles, as discussed by Robert Thatcher in an essay for this chapter. The dynamic framework for analyzing pathways of growth provides an important conceptual and methodological advance in our ability to make connections between neurological and cognitive growth, which will have major educational implications for learning-disabled children. The Editors In recent years developmental science has been transformed – from a relatively static framework that assume…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511489952.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using dynamic systems modeling, neo-Piagetian frameworks allow observation of multiple pathways with differential sequencing for the acquisition of a given skill, such as reading.

    “Using dynamic systems modeling, such frameworks allow us to observe multiple pathways with differential sequencing for the acquisition of a given skill, such as reading”

    From Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context1 (2019) · cites this paper as Fischer, Rose, & Rose, 2007

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 23

Metadata

Authors
Fischer, K. W., Rose, L. T., & Rose, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Colorado System (US)
Venue
Mind, Brain and Education in Reading Disorders
Published
2007-05-17
Pages
101-123
OpenAlex
W1651532627
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.65
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
learning disabilities, developmental pathways, dynamical systems theory, growth cycle, brain development, cognitive development, compensatory abilities, children with learning disabilities, cortical electrical activity, developmental assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review