Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security
Abstract
This 2003 book develops the idea that since decolonisation, regional patterns of security have become more prominent in international politics. The authors combine an operational theory of regional security with an empirical application across the whole of the international system. Individual chapters cover Africa, the Balkans, CIS Europe, East Asia, EU Europe, the Middle East, North America, South America, and South Asia. The main focus is on the post-Cold War period, but the history of each regional security complex is traced back to its beginnings. By relating the regional dynamics of security to current debates about the global power structure, the authors unfold a distinctive interpretation of post-Cold War international security, avoiding both the extreme oversimplifications of the unipolar view, and the extreme deterritorialisations of many globalist visions of a new world disorder. Their framework brings out the radical diversity of security dynamics in different parts of the world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Levant and the Gulf function as sub-complexes within the Middle East regional security complex.
“From a regional security complex perspective (Buzan & Wæver 2003), the Levant (Israel, Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt) and the Gulf (Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Qatar, Iraq) function as sub-complexes.”
From The Changing Power and Security Dynamics in the Middle East (2025) · cites this paper as Buzan & Wæver 2003
Regional disputes in the Middle East easily spill over due to geopolitical interdependence.
“Geopolitical interdependence, border conflicts and regional disputes easily spill over (Buzan & Wæver 2003).”
From The Changing Power and Security Dynamics in the Middle East (2025) · cites this paper as Buzan & Wæver 2003
Cites
China, the U.S.-Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia
Christensen, T. J. (1999) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.23.4.49 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buzan, B. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616617 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Self-citationImagining the Middle East: the state, nationalism and regional international society
Göl, A. (2015) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1080/23269995.2015.1053191 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The Changing Power and Security Dynamics in the Middle East
Alakel, M., & Arab, A. N. A. (2025) · İmgelem · doi:10.53791/imgelem.1601955 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Isani, M. A. (2025) · Contemporary Review of the Middle East · doi:10.1177/23477989251345221 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Buzan, B., & Wæver, O.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-12-04
- OpenAlex
- W4211026853
- Cited by
- 1,886
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 223 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 38.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
- Keywords
- regional security, regional security complexes, global power structure, unipolarity, decolonization, regionalism, security dynamics, global disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review