Cited by 1,886International Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsGlobal Security and Public Health

Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security

Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole·2003·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

This 2003 book develops the idea that since decolonisation, regional patterns of security have become more prominent in international politics. The authors combine an operational theory of regional security with an empirical application across the whole of the international system. Individual chapters cover Africa, the Balkans, CIS Europe, East Asia, EU Europe, the Middle East, North America, South America, and South Asia. The main focus is on the post-Cold War period, but the history of each regional security complex is traced back to its beginnings. By relating the regional dynamics of security to current debates about the global power structure, the authors unfold a distinctive interpretation of post-Cold War international security, avoiding both the extreme oversimplifications of the unipolar view, and the extreme deterritorialisations of many globalist visions of a new world disorder. Their framework brings out the radical diversity of security dynamics in different parts of the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511491252

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Levant and the Gulf function as sub-complexes within the Middle East regional security complex.

    “From a regional security complex perspective (Buzan & Wæver 2003), the Levant (Israel, Palestine, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt) and the Gulf (Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Qatar, Iraq) function as sub-complexes.”

    From The Changing Power and Security Dynamics in the Middle East (2025) · cites this paper as Buzan & Wæver 2003

  • Regional disputes in the Middle East easily spill over due to geopolitical interdependence.

    “Geopolitical interdependence, border conflicts and regional disputes easily spill over (Buzan & Wæver 2003).”

    From The Changing Power and Security Dynamics in the Middle East (2025) · cites this paper as Buzan & Wæver 2003

Authors
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2003-12-04
OpenAlex
W4211026853
Cited by
1,886
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 223 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 46
FWCI
38.98
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Peace and Security Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global Security and Public Health
Keywords
regional security, regional security complexes, global power structure, unipolarity, decolonization, regionalism, security dynamics, global disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review