The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lenition of |h| and glottal stop
Abstract
Introduction In this paper we examine the effect of prosodic structure on how segments are pronounced. The segments selected for study are /h/ and glottal stop /?/. These segments permit us to concentrate on allophony in source characteristics. Although variation in oral gestures may be more studied, source variation is an extremely pervasive aspect of obstruent allophony. As is well known, /t/ is aspirated syllable-initially, glottalized when syllable-final and unreleased, and voiced throughout when flapped in an intervocalic falling stress position; the other unvoiced stops also have aspirated and glottalized variants. The weak voiced fricatives range phonetically from essentially sonorant approximants to voiceless stops. The strong voiced fricatives exhibit extensive variation in voicing, becoming completely devoiced at the end of an intonation phrase. Studying /h/ and /?/ provides an opportunity to investigate the structure of such source variation without the phonetic complications related to presence of an oral closure or constriction. We hope that techniques will be developed for studying source variation in the presence of such complications, so that in time a fully general picture emerges. Extensive studies of intonation have shown that phonetic realization rules for the tones making up the intonation pattern (that is, rules which model what we do as we pronounce the tones) refer to many different levels of prosodic structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01708572 · Cited by 734
Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview
Gordon, M., & Ladefoged, P. (2001) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.2001.0147 · Cited by 678
Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives
Cho, T., Jun, S.-A., & Ladefoged, P. (2002) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.2001.0153 · Cited by 431
Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences
Byrd, D. (1996) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1006/jpho.1996.0012 · Cited by 362
The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology
Anderson, S. R., & Lightfoot, D. W. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613869 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Pierrehumbert, J., & Talkin, D.
- Venue
- Gesture, Segment, Prosody
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1992-05-14
- Pages
- 90-127
- OpenAlex
- W2991624302
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lenition of |h| and glottal stop. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511519918.005
- The paper
- Pierrehumbert, J., & Talkin, D. (1992). Lenition of |h| and glottal stop. Gesture, Segment, Prosody. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519918.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.