The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy
Abstract
The present chapter addresses three major issues. First, we analyze how culture might affect the various sources of self-efficacy belief systems. For this purpose, the dimensions of cultural diversity specified by Hofstede (1980, 1991; see also Triandis, 1989) and their impact on the sources of self-efficacy information in family and school contexts are examined. Second, we compare children's self-efficacy beliefs in East and West Berlin, Moscow, and Los Angeles based on data from an ongoing research project coordinated by G. Oettingen, T. D. Little, and P. B. Baltes. The results demonstrate cross-cultural variations in efficacy beliefs that are congruent with differences in efficacy-relevant influences hypothesized to be operating in each culture's school contexts. Third, we discuss the critical question of whether self-efficacy effects on cognition, affect, and motivation are universal across cultures. We speculate on the type of research that would be needed to demonstrate universality, which raises issues of individual versus collective efficacy. Culture and the sources of self-efficacy information Bandura (1977, in press) specifies four information sources that people use in forming their sense of personal efficacy. The most important source is performance experiences . Successes build a sense of self-efficacy; failures weaken it. Repeated early failures especially may have the most adverse effect if they cannot be discounted as due to lack of effort or unfavorable circumstances. Failures are less detrimental if people have already developed a strong sense of self-efficacy through early frequent successes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes.
Triandis, H. C. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.51.4.407 · Cited by 1,457
Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.599 · Cited by 746
Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships
Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011 · Cited by 459
Cheng, C., Cheung, S. F., Chio, J. H.-M., & Chan, M.-P. S. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028596 · Cited by 407
Optimism and realism: A review of self‐efficacy from a cross‐cultural perspective
Klassen, R. M. (2004) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207590344000330 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Oettingen, G.
- Venue
- Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-04-28
- Pages
- 149-176
- OpenAlex
- W51824615
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511527692.007
- The paper
- Oettingen, G. (1995). Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527692.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.