The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-efficacy in career choice and development
Abstract
There are few other decisions that exert as profound an influence on people's lives as the choice of a field of work or career. Not only do most people spend considerably more time on the job than in any other single activity (save, arguably, sleep), but choice of occupation significantly affects one's lifestyle. Work adjustment is intimately associated with mental health and physical well-being. – Hackett & Betz, in press. This chapter addresses the role of efficacy beliefs in the important area of human functioning concerning career decision making and career development. Theories of career development Some psychologists have always been concerned with work. However, career development has received less attention in the mainstream literature (Osipow, 1986). Career development, as opposed to training for job skills (e.g., vocational education), can be defined as the preparation for, choice of, entry into, and adjustment to work throughout the life span (Super, 1990). Although the demand for career guidance has long been high among adolescents and young adults, career counseling has not received the attention it warrants from most applied psychologists (Hackett, 1993; Spokane, 1991). In today's rapidly changing job markets the need for career services is only likely to increase. The earliest forms of vocational guidance, now commonly termed career counseling or career intervention, were rooted in differential psychology (Crites, 1981). The approaches to career counseling based on trait and factor or “matching men [sic] and jobs” models, historically atheoretical, have now been reconceptualized in the form of “person-environment (P-E) fit” theories (Hackett, Lent, & Greenhaus, 1991).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context
Bandura, A. (2002) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00092 · Cited by 2,092
Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. G. (2000) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/316962 · Cited by 991
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1163477 · Cited by 835
Bandura, A. (2010) · The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836 · Cited by 576
McCormick, J., & McPherson, G. (2003) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735603031001322 · Cited by 307
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackett, G.
- Venue
- Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1995-04-28
- Pages
- 232-258
- OpenAlex
- W1526920212
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-efficacy in career choice and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511527692.010
- The paper
- Hackett, G. (1995). Self-efficacy in career choice and development. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527692.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.