The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Odd Markets in Japanese History: Law and Economic Growth
Abstract
Employing a rational-choice approach, Professor Ramseyer studies the impact of Japanese law on economic growth in Japan. Toward that end, the author investigates the way law governed various markets and the way that people negotiated contracts within those markets. For much of the period at stake, the Japanese government was an oligarchy rather than a democracy; the judges operated a civil rather than common law regime; the economy grew modestly but erratically; and social customs changed rapidly and radically. As a result, this study applies an economic logic, but to markets in a vastly different world, in a different historical period, and with a different political regime and legal system. Findings reveal that the legal system generally promoted mutually advantageous deals, and that people generally negotiated in ways that shrewdly promoted their private best interests. Whether in the markets for indentured servants, prostitutes, or marriage partners, Odd Markets in Japanese History reports little evidence of either age- or gender- related exploitation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“That explanation (or part of it) lies instead in the Tokugawa and Meiji (1868-1912) policies that protected and facilitated investments in physical and human capital: in the customs, laws, and courts that enforced claims and transactions involving scarce resources (Ramseyer, 1996).”
From The competitive enforcement of property rights in medieval Japan: The role of temples and monasteries (2009) · cites this paper as Ramseyer, 1996
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Constraining Dictatorship: From Personalized Rule to Institutionalized Regimes
Meng, A. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108877497 · Cited by 215
The Depressing Effect of Agricultural Institutions on the Prewar Japanese Economy
Hayashi, F., & Prescott, E. C. (2008) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/591804 · Cited by 175
Property Rights and Property Wrongs
Frye, T. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316661727 · Cited by 80
Miwa, Y., & Ramseyer, J. M. (2000) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/468067 · Cited by 75
Self-citationGuanxi: Personal connections in Chinese society
Hsiung, B. (2011) · Journal of Bioeconomics · doi:10.1007/s10818-011-9118-9 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramseyer, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ramseyer, J. Mark
- ORCID
- Ramseyer, J. Mark
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1996-09-28
- OpenAlex
- W2134399632
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Japanese History and Culture
- Keywords
- Japanese law, economic growth, contract negotiation, legal history, civil law, oligarchy, indentured servants, prostitution, marriage market, social customs, Edo period, Edo bakumatsu
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review