Cited by 42Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters

Downes, Barbara J., Barmuta, Leon A., Fairweather, Peter G., Faith, Daniel P., Keough, Michael J., Lake, P. S., Mapstone, Bruce D., Quinn, Gerry P.·2002·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Monitoring Ecological Impacts provides the tools needed by professional ecologists, scientists, engineers, planners and managers to design assessment programs that can reliably monitor, detect and allow management of human impacts on the natural environment. The procedures described are well grounded in inferential logic, and the statistical models needed to analyse complex data are given. Step-by-step guidelines and flow diagrams provide the reader with clear and useable protocols, which can be applied in any region of the world and to a wide range of human impacts. In addition, real examples are used to show how the theory can be put into practice. Although the context of this book is flowing water environments, especially rivers and streams, the advice for designing assessment programs can be applied to any ecosystem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511542015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of Hill's criteria had been proposed for applications in river ecology and restoration but not implemented in a real-world example.

    “The use of Hill's criteria had been proposed for applications in river ecology and restoration but not implemented in a real-world example (Downes et al. 2002).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Downes et al. 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Downes, B. J., Barmuta, L. A., Fairweather, P. G., Faith, D. P., Keough, M. J., Lake, P. S., Mapstone, B. D., & Quinn, G. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Australian Museum (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • James Cook University (AU)
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2002-01-03
Pages
446
OpenAlex
W158176365
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
environmental management, rivers and streams, ecological monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review