The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Paradoxes of irrationality
Abstract
The idea of an irrational action, belief, intention, inference or emotion is paradoxical. For the irrational is not merely the nonrational, which lies outside the ambit of the rational; irrationality is a failure within the house of reason. When Hobbes says only man has ‘the privilege of absurdity’ he suggests that only a rational creature can be irrational. Irrationality is a mental process or state – a rational process or state – gone wrong. How can this be? The paradox of irrationality is not as simple as the seeming paradox in the concept of an unsuccessful joke, or of a bad piece of art. The paradox of irrationality springs from what is involved in our most basic ways of describing, understanding, and explaining psychological states and events. Sophia is pleased that she can tie a bowline. Then her pleasure must be due to her belief that she can tie a bowline and her positive assessment of that accomplishment. Further, and doubtless more searching, explanations may be available, but they cannot displace this one, since this one flows from what it is to be pleased that something is the case. Or take Roger, who intends to pass an examination by memorizing the Koran. This intention must be explained by his desire to pass the examination and his belief that by memorizing the Koran he will enhance his chances of passing the examination.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As we will see, I agree with those accounts that argue that reference to a ‘partition of the mind’ in the irrational agent as prominently suggested by Davidson (1982), is in such cases “little more than hand waving” (Elster, 2010, p. 270).”
From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Davidson, 1982
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 435
Boag, S. (2005) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354305059022 · Cited by 10
Phantasies, neurotic-beliefs, and beliefs-proper.
Brakel, L. A. W. (2001) · The American Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1023/a:1012549813733 · Cited by 10
Philosophy of Mind and Psychology
Kim, J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610189.005 · Cited by 11
Is the impostor hypothesis really so preposterous? Understanding the Capgras experience
Reimer, M. (2009) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080903409945 · Cited by 9
“Donald Davidson (1982) Correspondence to: Marga Reimer, University of Arizona – Philosophy, Social Sciences Building, Tucson AZ 85721, United States.”
BackgroundWisdom won from illness: The psychoanalytic grasp of human being
Lear, J. (2014) · The International Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1111/1745-8315.12209 · Cited by 9
“Philosophers have interpreted this to mean the a person can at the same time believe both P and not-P just so long as one of the beliefs is unconscious (Davidson, 1982).”
BackgroundThe Hidden Mechanisms of Prejudice: Implicit Bias and Interpersonal Fluency
Madva, A. (2012) · doi:10.7916/d84m9bp0 · Cited by 9
An empirical solution to the puzzle of weakness of will
Haas, J. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1712-0 · Cited by 10
“But if an agent judges that she has a preponderance of reasons for acting in a certain way, her action can no longer be described as weak-willed (Davidson 1982).”
BackgroundInfluentialLear, J. (2002) · The International Journal of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1516/qq2g-nbtx-m1a7-1lp5 · Cited by 9
Lepore, E., & Ludwig, K. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610189.002 · Cited by 8
Have We Vindicated the Motivational Unconscious Yet? A Conceptual Review
Billon, A. (2011) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00224 · Cited by 8
Reach, G., Benarbia, L., Benhamou, P., Delemer, B., Dubois, S., Gouet, D., Guerci, B., Jeandidier, N., Lachgar, K., LePape, G., et al. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s365398 · Cited by 5
Psychoanalysis and literature: An introduction
van Zyl, S. (1990) · Journal of Literary Studies · doi:10.1080/02564719008529930 · Cited by 8
Can We Interpret Irrational Behavior
Bortolotti, L. (2004) · University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) · Cited by 8
O sujeito em Foucault: estética da existência ou experimento moral?
Costa, J. F. (1995) · Tempo Social · doi:10.1590/ts.v7i1/2.85213 · Cited by 8
On the validity of Freud’s dream interpretations
Michael, M. (2008) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.12.014 · Cited by 7
Rawling, P. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610189.004 · Cited by 9
Axmacher, N. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00077 · Cited by 7
“Second, psychoanalytic reconstructions attempt to provide conscious or unconscious reasons – for an action, a somatic symptom, or a psychic content such as an affect (for the opposite view that explanations of seemingly irrational behavior are based on causes but not reasons, see Davidson, 1982).”
BackgroundScience, epistemology, and future prospects for psychoanalysis
Jalal, B., Settlage, B. L., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2014) · Neuropsychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/15294145.2014.976650 · Cited by 7
“(For further reading on Davidson’s view of psychoanalyzes, see Cavell, 1993; Davidson, 1982; Gardner, 1993a, 1993b; Hopkins, 1988, 1992; Lear, 1990; Wollheim, 1984, 1991, 1993.)”
Tillemans, T. J. F. (2008) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-007-9069-4 · Cited by 7
IV-Integrating the Non-Rational Soul
Lear, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00365.x · Cited by 7
Explanation and Rationality Naturalized
Henderson, D. K. (2010) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393109350680 · Cited by 7
“…Department of Philosophy, 1015 Oldfather Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Email: dhenderson2@unlnotes.unl.edu explanation that applies to the mental” (Davidson 1982, 299), and that this model is equally central within the human sciences generally—making for an explanatory practice that can…”
BackgroundInstability and Irrationality: Destructive and Constructive Services within Intelligent Environments
Egerton, S. J., Zamudio, V., Victor, C., et al. (2009) · Ambient intelligence and smart environments · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-034-6-125 · Cited by 7
Davidson on Rationality and Irrationality
Gozzano, S. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9227-7_9 · Cited by 7
“(Davidson 1982, p. 300)3.”
BackgroundGunther, Y. H. (2001) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1004700918246 · Cited by 7
Paradoxical Emotion: OnSui GenerisEmotional Irrationality
de Sousa, R. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0012 · Cited by 7
EPISTEMIC AKRASIA AND EPISTEMIC REASONS
Daoust, M. (2018) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2018.6 · Cited by 7
The role of pretense in the process of self-deception
Wei, X. (2020) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2020.1711960 · Cited by 7
“According to intentionalist views of self-deception, self-deception is parallel to interpersonal deception except that the deceiver and the deceived are one and the same person (Bermúdez 2000; Davidson 1982, 1985; Talbott 1995).”
BackgroundRaymont, P., & Brook, A. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199262618.003.0033 · Cited by 8
“Nagel (1971), Davidson (1982), and Dennett (1991) have all urged that the mind’s unity has been overstated.”
BackgroundMalpas, J. (1994) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/bf01128591 · Cited by 7
Multiple personality and irrationality
Gillett, G. R. (1991) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089108573018 · Cited by 7
Weakness of Will and Divisions of the Mind
Henden, E. (2004) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.0966-8373.2004.00207.x · Cited by 6
Akrasia, Dispositions And Degrees
Peijnenburg, J. (2000) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1023/a:1026563930319 · Cited by 6
Self-Deception: Theoretical Puzzles and Moral Implications
Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2011) · Phaenomenologica · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1848-7_11 · Cited by 6
Quantitative Psychotherapieforschung — Modernes Paradigma oder Potemkinsches Dorf?
Kaiser, E. (1995) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-663-11198-6_10 · Cited by 6
Madness: Terror and necessity – thoughts on Winnicott
Joannidis, C. (2011) · International Forum of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/0803706x.2011.609836 · Cited by 6
How is Akrasia Possible After All?
Gilead, A. (1999) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/1467-9329.00091 · Cited by 6
Horst, D. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2015.1080045 · Cited by 6
Egerton, S. J., Callaghan, V., & Clarke, G. (2008) · International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE) · doi:10.1049/cp:20081144 · Cited by 6
Sullivan‐Bissett, E. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009641883 · Cited by 5
Charles, D. (2004) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246100008651 · Cited by 5
Can Perceptual Experiences be Rational?
Siegel, S. (2018) · Analytic Philosophy · doi:10.1111/phib.12116 · Cited by 5
Burch, M. I. (2018) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-018-9568-9 · Cited by 5
De, M. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9227-7_1 · Cited by 5
Epistemic Akrasia and Mental Agency
Borgoni, C. (2014) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-014-0205-4 · Cited by 5
Akratic attitudes and rationality
Dunn, R. (1992) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048408112340023 · Cited by 5
Narrative, identity and the therapeutic encounter
Young, M. J., & Bursztajn, H. J. (2016) · Ethics Medicine and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jemep.2016.10.009 · Cited by 5
Perversion: Erotic Form of Hatred or Exciting Avoidance of Reality?
Jureidini, J. N. (2001) · Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1521/jaap.29.2.195.17260 · Cited by 5
Can we improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic disease?
Reach, G. (2014) · Bioethica Forum · doi:10.24894/bf.2014.07027 · Cited by 4
Akrasia, Picoeconomics, and a Rational Reconstruction of Judgment Formation in Dynamic Choice
Zheng, Y. (2001) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1023/a:1010361710316 · Cited by 4
Taking the Linguistic Turn Seriously
Fisch, M. (2008) · The European Legacy · doi:10.1080/10848770802268790 · Cited by 4
Remnants of Psychoanalysis. Rethinking the Psychodynamic Approach to Self-Deception
Marraffa, M. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 4
Lauria, F., & Preissmann, D. (2018) · Les ateliers de l éthique · doi:10.7202/1059500ar · Cited by 4
“Intentionalists claim that self-deceived subjects intend, albeit unconsciously, to form the deceptive beliefs (Davidson, 1982, 1985; Bermúdez, 1997, 2000).”
BackgroundSarzano, M. (2018) · Les ateliers de l éthique · doi:10.7202/1059501ar · Cited by 4
Self-deception and shifting degrees of belief
Chan, C. Y., & Rowbottom, D. P. (2019) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2019.1646419 · Cited by 4
“The psychological route is taken, in different ways, by Davidson (1982), Pears (1984), and Rorty (1988).”
BackgroundArticular models for first-degree paraconsistent systems
Jennings, R. E., & Chen, Y. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics · doi:10.1109/coginf.2010.5599781 · Cited by 4
A plea for a more dialectical relationship between personal and subpersonal levels of analysis
Francesco, M. D., & Marraffa, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01165 · Cited by 4
“In this vein, the psychoanalytic partitioning the mind is seen as a metaphoric device to coherently describe within the personal-level explanatory framework a phenomenon (self-deception) that otherwise would be uninterpretable (Davidson, 1982).”
BackgroundBeing in two minds: The divided mind in theNyāyasūtras
Tuske, J. (1999) · Asian Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09552369908575501 · Cited by 4
Nilsson, A. (2015) · Journal for Person-Oriented Research · doi:10.17505/jpor.2015.18 · Cited by 4
Razones y causas en el psicoanálisis freudiano
Ávila, F. E. C. (2015) · Eidos · doi:10.14482/eidos.23.190 · Cited by 4
Prudence and the Temporal Structure of Practical Reasons
MacIntosh, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0010 · Cited by 4
Irrationality and the Dynamic Unconscious: The Case for Wishful Thinking
Sturdee, P. G. (1995) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 4
Bortolotti, L. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2862-1_8 · Cited by 4
Reasons, attitudes and the breakdown of reasons
Dunn, R. (1991) · Philosophia · doi:10.1007/bf02381969 · Cited by 4
Rationality and institutions: an inquiry into the normative implications of rational choice theory
Engelen, B. (2008) · Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · doi:10.23941/ejpe.v1i1.19 · Cited by 3
Tersman, F. (2004) · Synthese · doi:10.1023/b:synt.0000013240.14920.f7 · Cited by 3
“NOTES 1 For example, we may assume that the speaker “shares with us the desire to find warmth, love, security, and success, and the desire to avoid pain and distress” (Davidson 1982, 302, see also Davidson 1984a, 19).”
BackgroundEm defesa de uma gestão compartilhada da medicação em psiquiatria
do Nascimento, M. L. (2012) · Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/s0103-73312012000100015 · Cited by 3
Action Explanations Are Not Inherently Normative
Grüne‐Yanoff, T. (2008) · Theoria · doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00006.x · Cited by 3
“…is seen as having mostly true beliefs, sharing many desires with her fellow humans (like “the desire to find warmth, love, security, and success, and the desire to avoid pain”, Davidson, 1982, p. 302), and if her reasoning approximates the rules of (classical) logic, statistic and decision theory.”
BackgroundSiegel, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00395.x · Cited by 3
Nánay, B. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197500941.003.0013 · Cited by 3
Kekes, J. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197668061.001.0001 · Cited by 3
Absorbed in deceit: modeling intention-driven self-deception with agential layering
Korczyk, K. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2406891 · Cited by 3
Parábolas freudianas: as narcísicas feridas e o arqueólogo
Loffredo, A. M. (2006) · Jornal de Psicanálise · Cited by 3
Weakness of Will and Time Preference
Shiono, N. (2008) · Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.4288/jafpos.16.1-2_37 · Cited by 3
Ideology, first‐person authority and self‐deception
Welshon, R. C. (1991) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691729108578613 · Cited by 3
Akrasia, health behavior, relapse, and reversal theory
O’Connell, K. A. (1996) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/s0029-6554(96)80057-1 · Cited by 3
Simanke, R. T. (2011) · Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology · doi:10.1080/00071773.2011.11006747 · Cited by 3
A solution to Davidson's paradox of irrationality
Henderson, D. (1987) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/bf00226523 · Cited by 3
Acting on Phantasy and Acting on Desire
Galgut, E. (2011) · South African Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.4314/sajpem.v30i2.67774 · Cited by 3
Schizophrenia and the estranged self
Fernández, J., & Bliss, S. (2016) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12583 · Cited by 3
The Mismatch Problem: Why Mele's Approach to the Puzzle of Synchronic Self‐control Does Not Succeed
Altehenger, H. (2021) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12344 · Cited by 3
Semantics and Metaphysics of Events
Pietroski, P. M. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610189.006 · Cited by 3
Greifinger, J. (1995) · The Communication Review · doi:10.1080/10714429509388251 · Cited by 3
Mele, A. R. (1988) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515088808572935 · Cited by 3
Judging by a Different Standard? Examining the Role of Rationality in Assessments of Mental Capacity
Banner, N. F. (2010) · CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) · Cited by 3
Does Freudian Theory Resolve “The Paradoxes of Irrationality”?*
Grünbaum, A. (2001) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00044.x · Cited by 3
Schwed, M. (2001) · Cited by 3
Decision-Making and Institutionalised Cognition
Handlbauer, G. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59783-1_12 · Cited by 3
Bounded emotionality and our doxastic norms
Ma, W. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2124540 · Cited by 2
Akratic and beneficial intentional self-deception
Curzer, H. J. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2420354 · Cited by 2
Self-Deception and Dissociation
Curzer, H. J. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00888-3 · Cited by 2
La conciencia errónea. De Sócrates a Tomás de Aquino
Vigo, A. G. (2013) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 2
O tak zwanym problemie prostych umysłów
Schetz, A. (2013) · Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) · doi:10.13153/diam.30.2011.455 · Cited by 2
Cavell, M. (2000) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/00030651000480010501 · Cited by 2
“A precursor to the best-known one, “Paradoxes of Irrationality” (Davidson 1982), was delivered as the Ernest Jones lecture before the British Psychoanalytical Association on April 26, 1978.”
MethodSelf-Knowledge and Rationality
Spitzley, T. (2009) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-009-9174-x · Cited by 2
Spatiality, imagery, and the paradox of fictional emotions
Zhok, A. (2015) · PARADIGMI · doi:10.3280/para2014-003010 · Cited by 2
‘Common Purpose’: The Crowd and the Public
Kistner, U. (2014) · Law and Critique · doi:10.1007/s10978-014-9146-4 · Cited by 2
“…of consistency in the pattern of beliefs/attitudes/emotions/intentions, and actions (as for instance in wishful thinking, acting contrary to one’s own best judgement, selfdeception, believing something that one holds to be discredited by the weight of evidence, etc.) (Davidson 1982, p. 290).”
BackgroundInterpretando la Paradoja de Moore: la irracionalidad de una oración mooreana
Borgoni, C. (2008) · THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science · doi:10.1387/theoria.392 · Cited by 2
Reconocimiento de Paternidad: Tópicos y Cuestiones Civiles
Eduardo Gandulfo, R. (2007) · Revista Chilena de Derecho · doi:10.4067/s0718-34372007000200002 · Cited by 2
Cognitive Bias Modification as a Remedy for Weakness of Will
Gillette, B. S. (2014) · Cited by 2
Funkhouser, E. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, D.
- Corresponding author
- Davidson, Donald
- Venue
- Philosophical Essays on Freud
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1982-11-25
- Pages
- 289-305
- OpenAlex
- W2244950361
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- irrationality, irrational behavior, irrational beliefs, Thomas Hobbes, absurdity, rationality, mental states, pleasure, intention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review