The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach
Abstract
Archaeology as Human Ecology is a new introduction to concepts and methods in archaeology. It deals not with artifacts, but with sites, settlements, and subsistence. Karl W. Butzer's goal is to interpret the ecosystem of which an archaeologicial site or site network was part. Components of this study include geo-archaeology, archaeobotany, zoo-archaeology, and archaeometry. These methods are then used in examining interactions between human communities and their biophysical environment: the impact of settlement on site formation and the effects of subsistence activities on plants, animals, soils, and overall landscape modification. Finally, the methods and theoretical approach, are applied to examine the processes of cultural change and continuity. The approach of Archaeology as Human Ecology goes far beyond traditional environmental archaeology, which is concerned with simple reconstruction. It provides a clear, systemic approach that immediately allows an assessment of interactions. For the first time, it attempts to develop a comprehensive spatial archaeology - one that is far more than derivative spatial analysis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Boundary crossing is closely connected to resource exploitation and the limitations of the local resource availability offered by the respective topography, geomorphology, and hydrology, and thus the particular landscape permeability (Butzer 1982).”
From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Butzer 1982
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere
Ellis, E. C. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0331 · Cited by 845
Critical perspectives on historical collapse
Butzer, K. W., & Endfield, G. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1114772109 · Cited by 242
Self-citationARCHAEOLOGY AND GLOBAL CHANGE: The Holocene Record
Kirch, P. V. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.29.102403.140700 · Cited by 217
Kempf, M. (2020) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-020-01157-4 · Cited by 30
New Evidence for Late Paleoindian-Early Archaic Subsistence Behavior in the Western Great Lakes
Kuehn, S. R. (1998) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/2694630 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Butzer, K. W.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1982-05-31
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review