The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regional systems of innovation?
Abstract
Introduction This chapter explores the possible existence and form of regional systems of innovation (RSI). Christopher Freeman has defined a national system of innovation (NSI) as the network of institutions in the public and private sectors whose activities and interactions initiate, import, modify and diffuse new technologies (Freeman, 1987, p. 1). Although this definition was applied at a national level it can arguably be equally applied at a regional or local level. This chapter will seek to explore these issues, not suggesting that regional systems of innovation should be seen in some way as supplanting national systems of innovation, but rather should be viewed as providing another layer or conceptual lens to the whole system of innovation. In so doing, it seeks to develop in a geographical sense at least part of Metcalfe's (1995, p. 41) view that the national unit may be too broad a category to allow a clear understanding of the complete dynamics of a technological system and instead focus should be on ‘a number of distinct technology-based systems each of which is geographically and institutionally localised within the nation but with links into the supporting national and international system’. More specifically, therefore, this analysis will examine whether the broad definition of national systems of innovation can also be applied at a regional level. Do, or can, regions offer distinct systems of innovation that are worthy of study? If they do exist, in what ways are they different from national systems of innovation? If the concept is relevant, is it becoming more or less applicable over time? What more general lessons can be learnt from the study of regional systems of innovation?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 · Cited by 2,571
Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography
Howells, J. R. L. (2002) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1080/00420980220128354 · Cited by 773
Self-citationSpaces and scales of innovation
Bunnell, T. G., & Coe, N. M. (2001) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913201682688940 · Cited by 533
Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective?
Howells, J. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.014 · Cited by 296
Self-citationENTREPRENEURSHIP, PROXIMITY AND REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS
STERNBERG, R. (2007) · Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.x · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Howells, J.
- Venue
- Innovation Policy in a Global Economy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-04-15
- Pages
- 67-93
- OpenAlex
- W2477298255
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 64.04
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional systems of innovation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511599088.007
- The paper
- Howells, J. (1999). Regional systems of innovation? Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511599088.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.