The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consistent Quantum Theory
Abstract
Quantum mechanics is one of the most fundamental yet difficult subjects in physics. Nonrelativistic quantum theory is presented here in a clear and systematic fashion, integrating Born's probabilistic interpretation with Schrödinger dynamics. Basic quantum principles are illustrated with simple examples requiring no mathematics beyond linear algebra and elementary probability theory. The quantum measurement process is consistently analyzed using fundamental quantum principles without referring to measurement. These same principles are used to resolve several of the paradoxes that have long perplexed physicists, including the double slit and Schrödinger's cat. The consistent histories formalism used here was first introduced by the author, and extended by M. Gell-Mann, J. Hartle and R. Omnès. Essential for researchers yet accessible to advanced undergraduate students in physics, chemistry, mathematics, and computer science, this book is supplementary to standard textbooks. It will also be of interest to physicists and philosophers working on the foundations of quantum mechanics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CH formalism contains the Born rule as a special case and hence fulfils Assumption (Q). Since it also satisfies (S), it follows from Theorem 1 that it violates (C).”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [35]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 271
Quantum Weak Values and Logic: An Uneasy Couple
Svensson, B. E. Y. (2017) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0068-5 · Cited by 10
What Connects Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics?
Hartle, J. B. (2005) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/3-540-26669-0_5 · Cited by 10
A symmetrical interpretation of the Klein-Gordon equationPreprint
Heaney, M. B., & Profile, S. (2013) · Cited by 10
Reply to “Comment on ‘Particle path through a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer’ ”
Griffiths, R. B. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.066102 · Cited by 10
Self-citationIs Quantum Mechanics Incompatible with Newton’s First Law?
Rabinowitz, M. (2007) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-007-9519-7 · Cited by 9
On the Possibility of Feminist Philosophy of Physics
Harrell, M. (2015) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26348-9_2 · Cited by 9
Non-locality and Possible World
Bigaj, T. (2006) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110323306 · Cited by 9
Electron Devices Simulation with Bohmian Trajectories
Albareda, G., Marian, D., Benali, A., Alarcón, A., Yaro, S. M., & Oriols, X. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118761793.ch7 · Cited by 9
Probabilistic and Quantum Event Structures
Winskel, G. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06880-0_25 · Cited by 9
Statistical model for quantum spin and photon number states
Powers, S., Xu, G., Fotso, H. F., Thomay, T. O., & Stojković, D. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.111.012217 · Cited by 8
Towards a Quantum Probability Theory of Similarity Judgments
Yearsley, J. M., Pothos, E. M., Hampton, J. A., & Duran, A. B. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_11 · Cited by 8
Implementation of Classical Communication in a Quantum World
Fields, C. (2012) · Information · doi:10.3390/info3040809 · Cited by 8
Projective versus weak measurement of charge in a mesoscopic conductor
Oehri, D., Lebedev, A. V., Lesovik, G. B., & Blatter, G. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.075312 · Cited by 8
In search for a standard of rationality
Pothos, E. M., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00049 · Cited by 8
Consistent histories for tunneling molecules subject to collisional decoherence
Coles, P. J., Gheorghiu, V., & Griffiths, R. B. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.042111 · Cited by 8
Self-citationQuantum computing based state domain equations and feedback control
Zioui, N., Mahmoudi, A., Mahmoudi, Y., & Tadjine, M. (2023) · Results in Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1016/j.rinam.2023.100385 · Cited by 8
Quantum histories without contrary inferences
Losada, M., & Laura, R. (2014) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2014.09.008 · Cited by 7
Nonextensive thermodynamic functions in the Schrödinger-Gibbs ensemble
Alonso, J. L., Castro, A., Clemente-Gallardo, J., Cuchí, J. C., Echenique, P. M., Esteve, J. G., & Falceto, F. (2015) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.022137 · Cited by 7
Bolotin, A. (2017) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5008374 · Cited by 7
Particle-field duality in QFT measurements
Papageorgiou, M., de Ramón, J., & Anastopoulos, C. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.065024 · Cited by 7
Consistent Quantum Mechanics Admits No Mereotopology
Fields, C. (2012) · Axiomathes · doi:10.1007/s10516-012-9202-3 · Cited by 7
Friedberg, R. M., & Hohenberg, P. C. (2014) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/092001 · Cited by 7
Dynamical emergence of Markovianity in local time scheme
Jeknić-Dugić, J., Arsenijević, M., & Dugić, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0041 · Cited by 7
How to measure the momentum of single quanta
Freericks, J. K. (2023) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-00967-6 · Cited by 7
Macroscopic Wigner's friend paradoxes: Consistency with weak macroscopic realism
Joseph, R. R., Thenabadu, M., Hatharasinghe, C., Fulton, J., Teh, R. Y., Drummond, P. D., & Reid, M. D. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.022219 · Cited by 7
Consistent treatments of quantum mechanics
Aharonov, Y., Popescu, S., & Tollaksen, J. (2011) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/pt.3.1273 · Cited by 6
Quantum logics in cognition: A proposal
Cuesta, J. A. F., Piazzai, M., & Rivieccio, U. (2025) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-025-05090-8 · Cited by 6
The Measurement Process in the Generalized Contexts Formalism for Quantum Histories
Losada, M., Vanni, L., & Laura, R. (2015) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-015-2720-1 · Cited by 6
Subclassical fields and polarization in electrodynamics
Planat, M., & Polonyi, J. (2010) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.045021 · Cited by 6
Quantifying Decoherence via Increases in Classicality
Fu, S., & Luo, S. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23121594 · Cited by 6
From a Quantum Paradox to CounterportationPreprint
Salih, H. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-601882/v1 · Cited by 6
Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: Dynamical Collapse Theories
Bassi, A. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190871994.013.77 · Cited by 6
Quantum computation for robot posture optimization
Otani, T., Takanishi, A., Hara, N., Takita, Y., & Kimura, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12109-0 · Cited by 5
Contrary Inferences in Consistent Histories and a Set Selection Criterion
Wallden, P. (2014) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9837-6 · Cited by 5
Raedt, H. A. D., Katsnelson, M. I., Donker, H. C., & Michielsen, K. F. L. (2015) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2185704 · Cited by 5
Conditional probabilities of measurements, quantum time, and the Wigner's-friend case
Trassinelli, M. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.032213 · Cited by 5
Einstein’s equations and the pseudo-entropy of pseudo-Riemannian information manifolds
Alshal, H. (2023) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03130-7 · Cited by 5
Classical limit of the quantum Zeno effect by environmental decoherence
Bedingham, D., & Halliwell, J. J. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.89.042116 · Cited by 5
Quantum Information: What Is It All About?
Griffiths, R. B. (2017) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e19120645 · Cited by 5
Self-citationIncompatible multiple consistent sets of histories and measures of quantumness
Halliwell, J. J. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.96.012123 · Cited by 5
Decoherence: From Interpretation to Experiment
Schlosshauer, M. (2022) · Fundamental theories of physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-88781-0_3 · Cited by 6
Fulton, J., Teh, R. Y., & Reid, M. D. (2024) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.022218 · Cited by 6
Cyber Risk in Insurance: A Quantum Modeling
Lefèvre, C., Tamturk, M., Utev, S., & Carenzo, M. (2024) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks12050083 · Cited by 4
What is Quantum Mechanics? A Minimal Formulation
Friedberg, R., & Hohenberg, P. C. (2018) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0145-4 · Cited by 4
Multitime quantum communication: Interesting but not counterfactual
Griffiths, R. B. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062219 · Cited by 4
Self-citationBricmont, J. (2024) · Fundamental theories of physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45434-9_4 · Cited by 4
Epistemic restrictions in Hilbert space quantum mechanics
Griffiths, R. B. (2013) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.88.042122 · Cited by 4
Self-citationUnconditional Quantum Correlations do not Violate Bell’s Inequality
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2015) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9930-5 · Cited by 4
Diagnosing the Trouble with Quantum Mechanics
Bricmont, J., & Goldstein, S. (2018) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10955-018-2113-y · Cited by 4
Quantum Mechanics and Information Retrieval
Melucci, M. (2015) · The Kluwer international series on information retrieval · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48313-8_3 · Cited by 4
Space-time reflection symmetry in the Jones formalism in optics
Bisson, J. (2023) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.108.033511 · Cited by 4
Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger test for multi-dimension and arbitrary time nodes entangled histories
Dong, J., Chen, Y., Xu, D., & Yin, Z. (2017) · 中国科学通报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2017.08.010 · Cited by 4
Evolution of quantum observables: from non-commutativity to commutativity
Fortín, S., Gadella, M., Holik, F., & Losada, M. (2019) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04546-7 · Cited by 4
Macroscopic Limit of Quantum Systems
Polonyi, J. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7090315 · Cited by 4
Myeong, S., Lee, J. W., Bae, J., & Cho, C. H. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05019-z · Cited by 3
Histories in quantum mechanics: distinguishing between formalism and interpretation
Losada, M., & Lombardi, O. (2018) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-017-0197-x · Cited by 3
John Bell and the Great Enterprise
Sudbery, A. (2018) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v7i1.79 · Cited by 3
Quantum Measurement as Marginalization and Nested Quantum Systems
Loeliger, H., & Vontobel, P. O. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2019.2961377 · Cited by 3
Nelson-Isaacs, S. (2020) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum3010002 · Cited by 3
A New Organization of Quantum Theory Based on Quantum Probability
Sontz, S. B. (2023) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-023-00691-0 · Cited by 3
Two probability theories and a garbage can
Mortimore, D., Canan, M., & Buettner, R. R. (2023) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-023-09378-3 · Cited by 3
On Existence of Quantum Trajectories for the Linear Deterministic Processes
Jeknić-Dugić, J., Arsenijević, M., & Dugić, M. (2024) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-024-05610-1 · Cited by 3
Postponing the Past: An Operational Analysis of Delayed-Choice Experiments
Bahrami, M., & Shafiee, A. (2009) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9375-9 · Cited by 3
Melucci, M. (2015) · The Kluwer international series on information retrieval · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48313-8_2 · Cited by 3
Jones, R. M. (2020) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02696-w · Cited by 3
Held, C. (2021) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00409-0 · Cited by 3
Classical Stochastic Representation of Quantum Mechanics
de Oliveira, M. J. (2024) · Brazilian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1007/s13538-024-01649-x · Cited by 2
Final states in quantum cosmology: Cosmic acceleration as a quantum postselection effect
Anastopoulos, C. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.064045 · Cited by 3
Terris, B. (2025) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-025-00837-2 · Cited by 2
Philosophy of Polarization-Path Entanglement in Quantum Optics
Czerwiński, A. (2025) · Optics · doi:10.3390/opt6030039 · Cited by 2
Testing Temporal Contextuality with Quantum Entangled Histories
Pan, G., Zhang, G., & Sun, Q.-H. (2019) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-019-04144-1 · Cited by 2
How to evaluate counterfactuals in the quantum world
Bigaj, T. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0195-7 · Cited by 2
Super Quantum Measures on Finite Spaces
Xie, Y., Yang, A., & Ren, F. (2013) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-013-9731-7 · Cited by 2
Sudbery, A. (2022) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-022-05046-5 · Cited by 2
Threshold in Quantum Correlated Interference for a Particle Interacting with Two Scatterers
Kowalski, F. V. (2022) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.202100322 · Cited by 2
Consistent Histories and Many Worlds
Bigaj, T. (2023) · Quantum Reports · doi:10.3390/quantum5010012 · Cited by 2
Reply to “Comment to ‘The laws of physics do not prohibit counterfactual communication’ ”
Salih, H., Hance, J. R., McCutcheon, W., & Rarity, J. (2025) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01043-8 · Cited by 2
The Presentiment Effect Points to an Occurrence of a von Neumann's Collapse
Levin, E. Y. (2023) · Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition · doi:10.31156/jaex.24455 · Cited by 1
Constructing the nonclassical lifetime distribution of two-level systems via quantum reliability
Li, Y., Du, Y.-M., Ding, W., Fei, Z., Fu, L., & Wang, X. (2025) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/w98h-hqb2 · Cited by 1
Shimony, A. (2009) · The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9107-0_24 · Cited by 1
Merlin, R. D. (2015) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s021797921530011x · Cited by 1
Quantum Measures on Finite Effect Algebras with the Riesz Decomposition Properties
Yang, A., & Xie, Y. (2014) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-014-9826-9 · Cited by 1
Relational Realism: The Evolution of Ontology to Praxiology in the Philosophy of Nature
Epperson, M. (2008) · World Futures · doi:10.1080/02604020802557367 · Cited by 1
Consistent histories and contrary inferences
Nisticò, G. (2005) · Brazilian Journal of Physics · doi:10.1590/s0103-97332005000300020 · Cited by 1
Is Uniqueness of Reality Predicted by the Quantum Laws?
Omnes, R. L. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51608-0_17 · Cited by 1
Quantum Dynamics as Landau–Lifshitz-Type Dynamics and Random Wave Function Collapse
Mayergoyz, I. D. (2017) · IEEE Magnetics Letters · doi:10.1109/lmag.2017.2730162 · Cited by 1
Quantum interval-valued probability: Contextuality and the Born rule
Tai, Y.-T., Hanson, A. J., Ortíz, G., & Sabry, A. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.052121 · Cited by 1
Trassinelli, M. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.052224 · Cited by 1
Epistemic and Ontic Quantum States
Dick, R. (2020) · Graduate texts in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57870-1_19 · Cited by 1
A glimpse into Feynman's contributions to the debate on the foundations of quantum mechanics
Mauro, M. D., Esposito, S., & Naddeo, A. (2023) · Pisa University Press eBooks · doi:10.12871/978883339843322 · Cited by 1
ONTOLOGIZATION IN THE FORMATION OF THE PHILOSOPHICAL POSITION OF AN ECONOMY OBSERVER
Spassky, I. (2023) · Visnyk of the Lviv University · doi:10.30970/pps.2023.46.22 · Cited by 1
Entanglement and discernibility of identical particles
Bigaj, T. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0105 · Cited by 1
About The Measurement Process in Quantum Mechanics
Bracci, L., & Picasso, L. E. (2025) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-025-06091-6 · Cited by 1
Conceptual Analysis of Quantum History Theory
Nisticò, G. (2003) · Physics Essays · doi:10.4006/1.3025560 · Cited by 1
Economou, E. N. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20654-7_3
Temporal Non-Locality: Fact or Fiction?
Günter Mahler, A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_19
Simultaneous Elements of Reality for Incompatible Properties by Exploiting Locality
Sestito, A. (2013) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-012-9697-x
Information, Correlations, and More
David, F. (2014) · Lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10539-0_5
Consistent Quantum Histories: Towards a Universal Language of Physics
Grygiel, W. P. (2007) · Old and New Concepts of Physics · doi:10.2478/v10005-007-0004-0
Is the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics consistent?
Okon, E. (2013) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/442/1/012045
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, Robert B.
- ORCID
- Griffiths, Robert B.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-11-29
- OpenAlex
- W4301255404
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- International Linear Collider (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
- Keywords
- consistent histories, measurement problem, Born rule, Schrödinger equation, double-slit experiment, Schrödinger's cat, quantum paradoxes, quantum foundations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
