The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Indirect speech acts
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The simplest cases of meaning are those in which the speaker utters a sentence and means exactly and literally what he says. In such cases the speaker intends to produce a certain illocutionary effect in the hearer, and he intends to produce this effect by getting the hearer to recognize his intention to produce it, and he intends to get the hearer to recognize this intention in virtue of the hearer's knowledge of the rules that govern the utterance of the sentence. But, notoriously, not all cases of meaning are this simple: In hints, insinuations, irony, and metaphor – to mention a few examples – the speaker's utterance meaning and the sentence meaning come apart in various ways. One important class of such cases is that in which the speaker utters a sentence, means what he says, but also means something more. For example, a speaker may utter the sentence “I want you to do it” by way of requesting the hearer to do something. The utterance is incidentally meant as a statement, but it is also meant primarily as a request, a request made by way of making a statement. In such cases a sentence that contains the illocutionary force indicators for one kind of illocutionary act can be uttered to perform, in addition , another type of illocutionary act.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 · Cited by 2,479
An Introduction to Sociolinguistics
Wardhaugh, R. (1986) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,013
Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies
Sbisà, M. (1992) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(92)90006-w · Cited by 1,695
Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese
Matsumoto, Y. (1988) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 · Cited by 1,028
Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics
Rasmussen, G. (1997) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(97)84203-8 · Cited by 1,012
Metadata
- Authors
- Searle, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- John Rogers Searle
- Venue
- Expression and Meaning
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1979-10-31
- Pages
- 30-57
- OpenAlex
- W2995748625
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 285.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- indirect speech acts, illocutionary force, illocutionary acts, speech act theory, utterance meaning, requests, hints, insinuation, irony, metaphor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review