The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Analysis of the Course of a Joke's Telling in Conversation
Abstract
0.0 In this paper we examine the sequential organization of the telling of a dirty joke in conversation. For the organization of the joke and also of its telling we find that there is a single most decisive feature: the joke is built in the form of a story. The decisiveness of that feature involves the fact that, there being means for sequentially organizing the telling of a story in conversation, the sequential organization of the telling of this joke's being built in the form of a story is largely given by those means. This telling is composed, as for stories, of three serially ordered and adjacently placed types of sequences which we call the preface, the telling, and the response sequences. We shall proceed by considering each of them in turn, intending that the adequacy of such a characterization as is developed in terms of these types for these materials will provide support to our proposal that the joke's construction in the form of a story is indeed its decisive feature. 0.1 In what follows we shall largely be concerned to subject the utterances of the fragment, of which we present a transcription at the close of this section, to analysis in terms of how they figure in the three types of sequences we have proposed to constitute organizational parts of the telling. In this endeavor one recurrent theme may be extracted for introductory comment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Self-citationPoetics and Performances as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 · Cited by 2,673
Between and within: alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments
Goodwin, C. (1986) · Human Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00148127 · Cited by 659
Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition.
Schegloff, E. A. (2004) · Perspectives on socially shared cognition. · doi:10.1037/10096-007 · Cited by 488
Issues in conversational joking
Norrick, N. R. (2003) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00180-7 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacks, H.
- Venue
- Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1989-10-19
- Pages
- 337-353
- OpenAlex
- W2097814956
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.70
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Analysis of the Course of a Joke's Telling in Conversation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511611810.022
- The paper
- Sacks, H. (1989). An Analysis of the Course of a Joke's Telling in Conversation. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511611810.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.