The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism
Abstract
The Construction of Nationhood, first published in 1997, is a thorough re-analysis of both nationalism and nations. In particular it challenges the current 'modernist' orthodoxies of such writers as Eric Hobsbawm, Benedict Anderson and Ernest Gellner, and it offers a systematic critique of Hobsbawm's best-selling Nations and Nationalism since 1780. In opposition to a historiography which limits nations and nationalism to the eighteenth century and after, as an aspect of 'modernisation', Professor Hastings argues for a medieval origin to both, dependent upon biblical religion and the development of vernacular literatures. While theorists of nationhood have paid mostly scant attention to England, the development of the nation-state is seen here as central to the subject, but the analysis is carried forward to embrace many other examples, including Ireland, the South Slavs and modern Africa, before concluding with an overview of the impact of religion, contrasting Islam with Christianity, while evaluating the ability of each to support supra-national political communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hastings claimed that the Bible was the first national guideline.
“The latter is allegedly a modern concept, but Hastings claimed that the Bible was the first national guideline (Hastings 1997, chp.1).”
From The Heralds of Zionism as Theological Revolutionaries (2021) · cites this paper as Hastings 1997, chp.1
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nation branding in Zimbabwe: Archaeological heritage, national cohesion, and corporate identities
Thondhlana, T. P., Chitima, S. S., & Chirikure, S. (2021) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053211002699 · Cited by 15
The Heralds of Zionism as Theological Revolutionaries
Mashiach, A. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12121100 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Hastings, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hastings, Adrian
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1997
- OpenAlex
- W4238136837
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 26.90
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nationalism and Cultural Identity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Cultural History and Identity Formation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Central European national history
- Keywords
- nationhood, nationalism, nation-state, biblical religion, vernacular literature, modernism, Eric Hobsbawm, modernization, religion and nationalism, Islam, Christianity, England, Ireland, South Slavs, Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review