Cited by 168Advanced Wireless Communication TechniquesError Correcting Code TechniquesWireless Communication Networks Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Iterative Receiver Design

Wymeersch, Henk·2007·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Iterative processing is an important technique with numerous applications. Exploiting the power of factor graphs, this detailed survey provides a general framework for systematically developing iterative algorithms for digital receivers, and highlights connections between important algorithms. Starting with basic concepts in digital communications, progressively more complex ideas are presented and integrated resulting in the development of cutting-edge algorithms for iterative receivers. Real-world applications are covered in detail, including decoding for turbo and LDPC codes, and detection for multi-antenna and multi-user systems. This accessible framework will allow the reader to apply factor graphs to practical problems, leading to the design of new algorithms in applications beyond digital receivers. With many examples and algorithms in pseudo-code, this book is an invaluable resource for graduate students and researchers in electrical engineering and computer science, and for practitioners in the communications industry. Additional resources for this title are available online at www.cambridge.org/9780521873154.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511619199

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attempts to jointly optimize each of these components, e.g., based on factor graphs, provide gains but lead to unwieldy and computationally complex systems.

    “Attempts to jointly optimize each of these components, e.g., based on factor graphs [12], provide gains but lead to unwieldy and computationally complex systems.”

    From An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wymeersch, H.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wymeersch, Henk
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2007-09-06
OpenAlex
W599135353
Cited by
168
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 22
FWCI
2.98
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Communication Networks Research
Keywords
iterative receiver, factor graphs, iterative detection algorithms, turbo codes, LDPC codes, channel decoding, multiuser detection, digital receiver, iterative methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review