The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories
Abstract
Opening a box a toddler says open ; seeing a toy car in it she says car ; taking the car out she says out ; putting it on the floor she says down . In the world at large these little remarks do not command much attention. But to people interested in how children learn to talk, the first steps into language raise fascinating and difficult questions. In this chapter, we are concerned with the central puzzle of where children's early word meanings come from. Are they introduced through language? Do they reflect concepts that arise spontaneously through infants' perceptual and cognitive development? Do language and cognition interact to produce early word meanings, and, if so, how? The idea that children learn how to structure meanings through exposure to language is usually associated with Whorf (1956). Whorf stressed that languages differ in the way they partition the world, and he proposed that in learning the semantic categories of their language, children also acquire a world view, a way of interpreting their experiences. Inspired by Whorf, Roger Brown also emphasized the role of the linguistic input in children's concept formation, arguing that a new word can be a “lure to cognition” (R. Brown 1958:206–7)- a recurrent signal that “serves to attract relevant experiences, to sum them over time into a conception governing the use of the word” (1965:311).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
AMBRIDGE, B., KIDD, E., ROWLAND, C. F., & THEAKSTON, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500091400049x · Cited by 589
The scope of usage-based theory
Ibbotson, P. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255 · Cited by 113
What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation
CAMERON-FAULKNER, T., LIEVEN, E., & THEAKSTON, A. (2007) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000906007884 · Cited by 103
Concepts in the Brain: The View From Cross-linguistic Diversity
Kemmerer, D. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190682620.001.0001 · Cited by 42
Kemmerer, D. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100861 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowerman, M., & Choi, S.
- Venue
- Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-01-11
- Pages
- 475-511
- OpenAlex
- W1506109252
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511620669.018
- The paper
- Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620669.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.