The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Inference for Spatial Processes
Abstract
The study of spatial processes and their applications is an important topic in statistics and finds wide application particularly in computer vision and image processing. This book is devoted to statistical inference in spatial statistics and is intended for specialists needing an introduction to the subject and to its applications. One of the themes of the book is the demonstration of how these techniques give new insights into classical procedures (including new examples in likelihood theory) and newer statistical paradigms such as Monte-Carlo inference and pseudo-likelihood. Professor Ripley also stresses the importance of edge effects and of lack of a unique asymptotic setting in spatial problems. Throughout, the author discusses the foundational issues posed and the difficulties, both computational and philosophical, which arise. The final chapters consider image restoration and segmentation methods and the averaging and summarising of images. Thus, the book will find wide appeal to researchers in computer vision, image processing, and those applying microscopy in biology, geology and materials science, as well as to statisticians interested in the foundations of their discipline.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ripley's K-function with isotropic edge correction was computed following Ripley, and the centred Besag's L-function transformation was applied.
“For both protocols, Ripley’s Kfunction with isotropic edge correction was computed following Ripley66,67, and the centred Besag’s L-function transformation was applied68.”
From Ecological legacies of pre-columbian settlements evident in palm clusters of neotropical mountain forests (2026) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics
Gelman, A., & Shalizi, C. R. (2013) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02037.x · Cited by 825
Quantitative Image Analysis of Cellular Heterogeneity in Breast Tumors Complements Genomic Profiling
Yuan, Y., Failmezger, H., Rueda, O. M., Ali, H. R., Gräf, S., Chin, S.-F., Schwarz, R. F., Curtis, C., Dunning, M. J., Bardwell, H., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004330 · Cited by 426
Close-Point Spatial Tests and Their Application to Random Number Generators
L'Écuyer, P., Cordeau, J.-F., & Simard, R. (2000) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.48.2.308.12385 · Cited by 38
Fajardo, S., Mohammadi, S., Gregorio de Souza, J., Ardila, C., Tapscott, A., Heidgen, S., Mayorga Hernández, M. I., Mota de Oliveira, S., Montejo, F., Moderato, M., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45976-2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ripley, B. D.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1988-11-17
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review