The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patterns of Moral Complexity
Abstract
Larmore aims to recover three forms of moral complexity that have often been neglected by moral and political philosophers. First, he argues that virtue is not simply the conscientious adherence to principle. Rather, the exercise of virtue apply. He argues - and this is the second pattern of complexity - that recognizing the value of constitutive ties with shared forms of life does not undermine the liberal ideal of political neutrality toward differing ideals of the good life. Finally Larmore agrues for what he calls the heterogeneity of morality. Moral thinking need not be exclusively deontological or consequentialist, and we should recognize that the ultimate sources of moral value are diverse. The arguments presented here do not attack the possibility of moral theory. But in addressing some of the central issues of moral and political thinking today thay attempt to restore to that thinking greater flexibility and a necessary sensitivity to our common experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights
Kymlicka, W. (1996) · doi:10.1093/0198290918.001.0001 · Cited by 3,337
Young, I. M. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0198297556.001.0001 · Cited by 3,250
Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society
(2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490934 · Cited by 1,751
Dancy, J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199270023.001.0001 · Cited by 1,677
Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship
Kymlicka, W. (2001) · doi:10.1093/0199240981.001.0001 · Cited by 1,539
Metadata
- Authors
- Larmore, C. E.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1987-01-30
- OpenAlex
- W4298312860
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patterns of Moral Complexity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511625107
- The paper
- Larmore, C. E. (1987). Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511625107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.