The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Ising model, computer simulation, and universal physics
Abstract
So the crucial change of emphasis of the last twenty or thirty years that distinguishes the new era from the old one is that when we look at the theory of condensed matter nowadays we inevitably talk about a ‘model.’ Michael Fisher (1983, 47) It is a curious fact that the index of The New Physics (Davies 1989), an anthology of eighteen substantial essays on recent developments in physics, contains only one entry on the topics of computers and computer simulation. Curious, because the computer is an indispensable tool in contemporary research. To different degrees, its advent has changed not just the way individual problems are addressed but also the sort of enterprise in which theorists engage, and hence the kind of theory that they propose. Consider, for example, chaos theory. Although the ideas underlying the theory were first explored by Poincar at the turn of the century, their development had to await the arrival of the computer. In The New Physics the beautiful pictures of fractal structures that illustrate the essay on chaos theory (Ford 1989) are, of course, computer generated. Yet, perhaps because it runs counter to the mythology of theoretical practice, that fact is mentioned neither in the captions that accompany the pictures nor elsewhere in the text. The indispensable has become invisible. The solitary entry on computers in the index takes us to the essay, ‘Critical Point Phenomena: Universal Physics at Large Length Scales’, by Alastair Bruce and David Wallace, and, within that essay, to a description of the so-called Ising model and the computer simulation of its behaviour.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Ising model has been shown to predict experimental observations of magnetic systems near T=Tc with high accuracy.”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [363]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, R. I. G.
- Corresponding author
- Hughes, R. I. G.
- ORCID
- Hughes, R. I. G.
- Venue
- Models as Mediators
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-10-21
- Pages
- 97-145
- OpenAlex
- W1682706204
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 12.53
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- Ising model, computer simulation, critical phenomena, condensed matter theory, chaos theory, fractals, computer-generated imagery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review