Cited by 67Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Potential flashbulbs: Memories of ordinary news as the baseline

Larsen, Steen F.·1992·Affect and Accuracy in Recall

Abstract

Some more or less ordinary memories On the evening of March 1, 1986, I was sitting at my portable computer just before going to bed. I was entering the following brief description into a database, adhering to a daily routine I had started on January 1 of that year: (1) When: 01.03.1986 What: Prime Minister murdered Who: Olof Palme Where: Stockholm DetailQ: How many shots hit him? DetailA: Two Source: Radio news, later “Politiken” (newspaper), TV, other papers ContextQ: What effects did it have for me? ContextA: I skipped breakfast and was 15 min late to pick up Pia. I was in the middle of the peaceful but tedious task of performing an experiment on my own memory. This terse record of a violent and quite upsetting event was part of the material that I would be probed about some months later by the computer and try to remember. Notice particularly that I included information on both the news itself and my personal circumstances, or context, when I first heard the news. There were other, equally upsetting, events in the database that I recorded during the 6 months of this diary keeping. Just 2 months later, this was entered: (2) When: 28.04.1986 What: Big nuclear accident, indicated by extremely radioactive cloud Who: Soviet power plant Where: Close to Kiev DetailQ: Where was the cloud first registered? DetailA: Sweden, 100 km north of Stockholm Source: Radio news, later TV evening news ContextQ: Where and when did I hear it first? ContextA: At Pia's place just after work; she w…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511664069.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other articles have emphasized that flashbulb memories may show evidence of inconsistency and are not always more consistent than non-flashbulb memories.

    “Other articles, however, have emphasized that flashbulb memories may show evidence of inconsistency and are not always more consistent than non-flashbulb memories (Larsen, 1992; Neisser & Harsch, 1992; Talarico & Rubin, 2003; Talarico & Rubin, 2007).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larsen, S. F.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Larsen, Steen F.
Venue
Affect and Accuracy in Recall
Published
1992-10-30
Pages
32-64
OpenAlex
W1945652703
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.32
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
flashbulb memory, memory retrieval, autobiographical memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review