The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnosis and Clinical Measurement in Psychiatry: A Reference Manual for SCAN
Abstract
In order to help people with a mental illness it is important to be able to understand and measure the severity of the experiences that they find distressing and disabling and which can affect their behaviour. SCAN is a form of interview, found acceptable to patients, which provides a detailed and accurate picture of 'mental state'. When analysed by computer it provides a diagnosis that is comparable wherever the system is used. The 9th edition of the Present State Examination (PSE-9) was published in 1974 and served to link the two main approaches to the description and classification of psychological problems. PSE-10/SCAN builds on the experience of extensive tests using PSE-9. It retains the main features of PSE-9 and links together the two international classification systems, ICD-10 and DSM-IV. This reference manual is a companion to the SCAN interview schedule and software. It describes the rationale and development of the system and provides a valuable introduction to its uses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Diagnosis was confirmed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN).55,56”
From Enhanced Automatic Action Imitation and Intact Imitation-Inhibition in Schizophrenia (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–109 of 109
Diagnostic interviews and clinical practice
Rogers, R., & Wupperman, P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511543579.055 · Cited by 3
Socially Learned Attitude Change is not reduced in Medicated Patients with Schizophrenia
Simonsen, A., Fusaroli, R., Skewes, J., Roepstorff, A., Mors, O. N., Bliksted, V., & Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37250-x · Cited by 3
Integrating Phenotypic Data For Depression
Butler, A. W., Cohen‐Woods, S., FARMER, A. E., et al. (2010) · Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics · doi:10.1515/jib-2010-136 · Cited by 2
Thorup, A. A., Hemager, N., Greve, A. N., Birk, M., Hjorthøj, C. R., Dietz, M. J., Jefsen, O. H., Krantz, M. F., Gregersen, M., Veddum, L., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1848366 · Cited by 1
Karhausen, L. (2023) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41633-0_5 · Cited by 1
Pathologie komplexen Erlebens und Verhaltens
Payk, T. R. (2015) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45531-9_8
Education in Psychiatry for Psychologists
Hodiamont, P. P. G. (2018) · Mental health and illness worldwide · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0866-5_6-1
Education in Psychiatry for Psychologists
Hodiamont, P. P. G. (2019) · Mental health and illness worldwide · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2350-7_6
Karhausen, L. (2025) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81257-6_10
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1998-12-10
- OpenAlex
- W2738927000
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- Present State Examination, psychiatric diagnosis, mental state assessment, ICD-10, DSM-IV, psychiatric classification, Clinical Interview Schedule, computer-aided diagnosis, severity measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review