The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating
Abstract
We need a new theory of mating systems … [one] that incorporates the conflicting interests of males and females, and the factors determining which sex is in control, in order to predict patterns of male-female pairing. Gross, 1994 Given that females, to one extent or another, subvert male interests by the internal manipulation of ejaculate, it is not inconceivable that males will have evolved little openers, snippers, levers and syringes that put sperm in the places females have evolved (‘intended’) for sperm with priority usage - collectively a veritable Swiss Army Knife of gadgetry! Lloyd, 1979 ABSTRACT The male–female interaction is an asymmetrical, usually obligate mutualism in which there are conflicts of interest whenever multiple potential partners that vary in quality are available for either sex. Understanding male–female confluences and conflicts of interest is required to explain the sexual sequence and how it evolves. Mating interactions involve multiple steps or stages, distinguishable because of differences arising out of changes in selection that occur during the sequence. Sexual selection and competition take several different forms, which must be understood before accurate interpretations can be made of mating events in any particular case. Sexual selection guided primarily by male–female conflicts of interest can result in resolvable evolutionary chases that lead to evolutionary stable strategies but perhaps more frequently lead to chases that tend to be unending (Parker 1979).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eberhard, W. G., Huber, B. A., S., R. L. R., Briceño, R. D., Salas, I., & Rodriguez, V. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01642.x · Cited by 389
Mating of Xenos vesparum (Rossi) (Strepsiptera, Insecta) revisited
Beani, L., Giusti, F., Mercati, D., Lupetti, P., Paccagnini, E., Turillazzi, S., & Dallai, R. (2005) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.10359 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, R. D., Marshall, D. C., & Cooley, J. R.
- Venue
- The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1997-06-12
- Pages
- 4-31
- OpenAlex
- W591736636
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511721946.002
- The paper
- Alexander, R. D., Marshall, D. C., & Cooley, J. R. (1997). Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. The Evolution of Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511721946.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.