The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Abstract
I S uppose most excavators would confess to a feeling of awe—embarrassment almost—when they break into a chamber closed and sealed by pious hands so many centuries ago. For the moment, time as a factor in human life has lost its meaning. Three thousand, four thousand years maybe, have passed and gone since human feet last trod the floor on which you stand, and yet, as you note the signs of recent life around you—the half-filled bowl of mortar for the door, the blackened lamp, the finger-mark upon the freshly painted surface, the farewell garland dropped upon the threshold—you feel it might have been but yesterday. The very air you breathe, unchanged throughout the centuries, you share with those who laid the mummy to its rest. Time is annihilated by little intimate details such as these, and you feel an intruder. That is perhaps the first and dominant sensation, but others follow thick and fast—the exhilaration of discovery, the fever of suspense, the almost overmastering impulse, born of curiosity, to break down seals and lift the lids of boxes, the thought—pure joy to the investigator—that you are about to add a page to history, or solve some problem of research, the strained expectancy—why not confess it?—of the treasure-seeker. Did these thoughts actually pass through our minds at the time, or have I imagined them since? I cannot tell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027600 · Cited by 2,006
Obstructive sleep apnoea and its cardiovascular consequences
Bradley, T. D., & Floras, J. S. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61622-0 · Cited by 1,385
The GABAergic deficit hypothesis of major depressive disorder
Luscher, B., Shen, Q., & Sahir, N. (2011) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2010.120 · Cited by 934
Bergmann, A., Martinez-Moreno, E., Teschner, D., Chernev, P., Gliech, M., de Araújo, J. F., Reier, T., Dau, H., & Strasser, P. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9625 · Cited by 913
Berg, J. M., Latzman, R. D., Bliwise, N. G., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2015) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000111 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Venue
- The Tomb of Tut-Ankh-Amen
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-09-30
- Pages
- 97-109
- OpenAlex
- W2497184447
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 843.92
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511722349.008
- The paper
- A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION. (2010). The Tomb of Tut-Ankh-Amen. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511722349.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.