The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life
Abstract
Andrew Sayer undertakes a fundamental critique of social science's difficulties in acknowledging that people's relation to the world is one of concern. As sentient beings, capable of flourishing and suffering, and particularly vulnerable to how others treat us, our view of the world is substantially evaluative. Yet modernist ways of thinking encourage the common but extraordinary belief that values are beyond reason, and merely subjective or matters of convention, with little or nothing to do with the kind of beings people are, the quality of their social relations, their material circumstances or well-being. The author shows how social theory and philosophy need to change to reflect the complexity of everyday ethical concerns and the importance people attach to dignity. He argues for a robustly critical social science that explains and evaluates social life from the standpoint of human flourishing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To reiterate, we are real, needy material beings (emotional, social, dependent and so much more both physically and psychologically; see Sayer 2011).”
From Species Being in the Twenty-First Century (2018) · cites this paper as Sayer 2011
In the citing paper
“To the extent that the clinician's role includes making decisions (perhaps on a shared basis with the patient), these are not merely 'rational' (i.e. based on the best available medical evidence) but also practical and ethicalthat is, they take account of the situated details of individual cases, including a serious engagement with 'what matters to people' to particular flesh-and-blood patients.77”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–915 of 915
Who is the person of labour law? Reflections on personhood as a project of utopian hope
Rodgers, L. (2026) · Economic and Industrial Democracy · doi:10.1177/0143831x251334723
Incorporating dignity in urban mobility justice: Moral emotions and injustice in Blackburn, UK
Plyushteva, A., & Francis, S. (2026) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980261465235
Fakhriati, F., Zain, M., Qudsy, S. Z., Syaifullah, D. H., Yunani, A., & Lastomo, D. (2026) · Conflict Resolution Quarterly · doi:10.1002/crq.70047
Soziale Probleme und das Verhältnis Theorie – Forschung – Politik – Praxis
Scherr, A., & Ziegler, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-45841-6_4
Beyond public vs. private: the ideational transformation of education in Chile’s market society
Rosenzvaig-Hernández, M. (2026) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2026.2707922
Mapping from below: Mental mapping for the study of everyday (in)securities
Liekens, F., Backer, M. L. D., & Melgaço, L. D. M. (2026) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azag065
From line to life course: Trajectory thinking and the temporal sociology of poverty
Butler, S. (2026) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/00380385261462745
Done, C., Gough, L. A., Clarke, N. D., et al. (2026) · Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health · doi:10.1080/2159676x.2026.2715145
Algorithmic identity regulation in the platform-based gig work of Indian food delivery workers
Bisht, N. S., Trusson, C., & Tripathy, A. K. (2026) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267261480593
Feminism Under Capture: Power, Voice, and the Reconstitution of Feminist Futures
Yousafzai, S., Bastian, B., Wood, B., et al. (2026) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.70236
Visualising the lived realities of ageing in Lisbon’s historic centre, Portugal
Larrabure, S. P., Silva, A. V., Estevens, A., & Pavel, F. (2026) · Cities & Health · doi:10.1080/23748834.2026.2732398
Life’s dignity within and beyond the workplace: Results from a national sample of US workers
Andersson, M. A., Upenieks, L., & Hitlin, S. (2026) · Work Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/09500170261468238
Telling, K. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2738724
Why the capabilities approach has some value in vocational education research
Wheelahan, L. (2026) · Journal of Vocational Education and Training · doi:10.1080/13636820.2026.2744996
Metadata
- Authors
- Sayer, A.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sayer, Andrew
- ORCID
- Sayer, Andrew
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2011-01-20
- OpenAlex
- W3188963984
- Cited by
- 929
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 44.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- concern, values, critique of modernism, eudaimonia, human dignity, everyday ethics, social theory, philosophy of social science, well-being, interpersonal relationships, critique of social science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review