The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Singularities of pairs
Abstract
In the last chapter, we introduced the Noether–Fano method for proving nonrationality of certain varieties. In this chapter, we develop further practical techniques for carrying out this program. To successfully use the Noether–Fano method, one needs to verify whether or not linear systems admit maximal centers. Recall that a maximal center is, roughly speaking, a place where there is a significant discrepancy between the birational transform and the pullback of a linear system. In this chapter, we develop tools for computing these discrepancies explicitly. The main issues we consider are the behavior of discrepancies under changing birational models, under finite morphisms, and under restriction to hypersurfaces. As our main application, we prove Theorem 5.20 on the numerical consequences at isolated maximal centers on a threefold, which was used in our proof of the nonrationality of smooth quartic threefolds. The classical proof of Theorem 5.20 consisted of rather intricate computations on a suitable resolution of the singularities of the linear system, but we here place the result in the more conceptual framework of singularities of pairs. The first three sections develop the basic theory of discrepancies and singularities of pairs. Our motivation is that a linear system has a maximal center if and only if the corresponding pair fails to be canonical. The important issues of how discrepancies can be computed from a log resolution and how they behave under finite maps are treated in the exercises.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Algebraic Geometry
Griffiths, P., & Harris, J. (1994) · Wiley · doi:10.1002/9781118032527 · Cited by 6,765
Introduction to Toric Varieties.
Fulton, W. (1993) · Cited by 2,778
Singular points of complex hypersurfaces
Milnor, J. (1968) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 2,189
Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds
Wells, R. O. (1980) · Graduate Texts in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3946-6 · Cited by 898
Higher Direct Images of Dualizing Sheaves I
Kollar, J. (1986) · The Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/1971351 · Cited by 477
Vector Bundles of Rank 2 and Linear Systems on Algebraic Surfaces
Reider, I. (1988) · Annals of Mathematics · doi:10.2307/2007055 · Cited by 471
Rational connectedness and boundedness of Fano manifolds
Kollár, J., Miyaoka, Y., & Мори, Ш. (1992) · Journal of Differential Geometry · doi:10.4310/jdg/1214453188 · Cited by 436
Flip theorem and the existence of minimal models for 3-folds
Mori, S. (1988) · Journal of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-1988-0924704-x · Cited by 313 · cited 4×
“These results, especially the progress leading up to [Mori88], are reviewed in several surveys.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialVariation of geometric invariant theory quotients
Dolgachev, I., & Hu, Y. (1998) · Publications mathématiques de l IHÉS · doi:10.1007/bf02698859 · Cited by 304
Stable pairs, linear systems and the Verlinde formula
Thaddeus, M. (1994) · Inventiones Mathematicae · doi:10.1007/bf01232244 · Cited by 259
Cited by
A Widely Applicable Bayesian Information Criterion
Watanabe, S. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1208.6338 · Cited by 719
(2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570615.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Venue
- Rational and Nearly Rational Varieties
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2004-04-22
- Pages
- 149-181
- OpenAlex
- W1656717670
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 71.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Singularities of pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511734991.007
- The paper
- Singularities of pairs. (2004). Rational and Nearly Rational Varieties. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511734991.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.