The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory
Abstract
Realism and constructivism, two key contemporary theoretical approaches to the study of international relations, are commonly taught as mutually exclusive ways of understanding the subject. Realist Constructivism explores the common ground between the two, and demonstrates that, rather than being in simple opposition, they have areas of both tension and overlap. There is indeed space to engage in a realist constructivism. But at the same time, there are important distinctions between them, and there remains a need for a constructivism that is not realist, and a realism that is not constructivist. Samuel Barkin argues more broadly for a different way of thinking about theories of international relations, that focuses on the corresponding elements within various approaches rather than on a small set of mutually exclusive paradigms. Realist Constructivism provides an interesting new way for scholars and students to think about international relations theory.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108647670 · Cited by 375
What made the modern world hang together: socialisation or stigmatisation?
Zarakol, A. (2014) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971914000141 · Cited by 230
The Dynamics of Global Power Politics: A Framework for Analysis
Goddard, S. E., & Nexon, D. H. (2016) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogv007 · Cited by 161
International Relations in the US Academy1
Maliniak, D., Oakes, A., Peterson, S., & Tierney, M. J. (2011) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00653.x · Cited by 149
Bettiza, G., & Lewis, D. G. (2019) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz075 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Barkin, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barkin, J. Samuel
- ORCID
- Barkin, J. Samuel
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-03-25
- OpenAlex
- W4244594006
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 11.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Keywords
- realist constructivism, realism, constructivism, international relations theory, theoretical paradigms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review