Varieties of memory compensation by older adults in episodic remembering
Abstract
In a recent paper (Bäckman, 1985a), I introduced a conceptual frame of reference for research on adult aging and episodic remembering based on the superordinate concepts of compensation and recoding. This chapter constitutes an extension and elaboration of the framework proposed there. One basic point of departure for the discussion here concerns the fact that older adults possess the ability to compensate for various deficits in episodic remembering through different types of contextual and cognitive support. A classification scheme comprising three basic categories of memory compensation in later adulthood is presented: compensation via experimenter-provided support, compensation via inherent task properties, and compensation via cognitive-support systems. These categories deal with proximal interactions between the capabilities of the learner and the actual task demands. It is also suggested that younger adults, because of superior ability in various recoding operations , are less dependent on contextual and cognitive support in order to remember successfully. “Recoding ” is here defined as “all the processes and operations an individual possesses that, when applied, bring about a richer and more elaborate representation of the initially registered information to be remembered ” (Tulving, 1983). It is argued that a multifactorial approach is a necessary prerequisite for gaining the best understanding of what happens with memory as one gets older. Accordingly, some aspects of memory compensation in later adulthood other than those falling under the aforementioned categories are described.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Older adults may use different kinds of contextual support to overcome age-related processing limits.
“they may rely on different varieties of contextual support to overcome age-related processing limitations”
From Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? (2008) · cites this paper as Bäckman, 1989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x · Cited by 1,495 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bäckman, L.
- Corresponding author
- Bäckman, Lars
- ORCID
- Bäckman, Lars
- Venue
- Everyday Cognition in Adulthood and Late Life
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1989-11-24
- Pages
- 509-544
- OpenAlex
- W2274203514
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- memory compensation, episodic memory, older adults, aging, recoding, contextual support, cognitive support, age differences in memory, later adulthood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review