The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Case Study Research: Principles and Practices
Abstract
Case Study Research: Principles and Practices aims to provide a general understanding of the case study method as well as specific tools for its successful implementation. These tools can be utilized in all fields where the case study method is prominent, including business, anthropology, communications, economics, education, medicine, political science, social work, and sociology. Topics include the definition of a 'case study,' the strengths and weaknesses of this distinctive method, strategies for choosing cases, an experimental template for understanding research design, and the role of singular observations in case study research. It is argued that a diversity of approaches - experimental, observational, qualitative, quantitative, ethnographic - may be successfully integrated into case study research. This book breaks down traditional boundaries between qualitative and quantitative, experimental and nonexperimental, positivist and interpretivist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tumbas, S., Berente, N., & Brocke, J. V. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-018-0055-0 · Cited by 242
Ziblatt, D. (2008) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.0.0021 · Cited by 187
It's all about mechanisms – what process-tracing case studies should be tracing
Beach, D. (2016) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2015.1134466 · Cited by 174
Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399710362524 · Cited by 142
Thomas, C. W., & Koontz, T. M. (2011) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390459.2011.557877 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerring, J.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W2223257916
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511803123
- The paper
- Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.