The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Charlemagne: The Formation of a European Identity
Abstract
Charlemagne is often claimed as the greatest ruler in Europe before Napoleon. This magisterial study re-examines Charlemagne the ruler and his reputation. It analyses the narrative representations of Charlemagne produced after his death, and thereafter focuses on the evidence from Charlemagne's lifetime concerning the creation of the Carolingian dynasty and the growth of the kingdom, the court and the royal household, communications and identities in the Frankish realm in the context of government, and Charlemagne's religious and cultural strategies. The book offers a critical examination of the contemporary sources and in so doing transforms our understanding of the development of the Carolingian empire, the formation of Carolingian political identity, and the astonishing changes effected throughout Charlemagne's forty-six year period of rule. This is a major contribution to Carolingian history which will be essential reading for anyone interested in the medieval past. Rosamond McKitterick has also received the 2010 Dr A. H. Heineken Prize for History for her research into the Carolingians.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain
(2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521583459 · Cited by 127
The New Cambridge History of the Bible
Marsden, R., & Matter, E. A. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521860062 · Cited by 114
UNIFIED CHINA AND DIVIDED EUROPE
Ko, C. Y., Koyama, M., & Sng, T. (2013) · International Economic Review · doi:10.1111/iere.12270 · Cited by 109
The representation of Old Saint Peter's basilica in theLiber Pontificalis
McKitterick, R. D. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107300453.007 · Cited by 84
Self-citationTHE PAPACY AND BYZANTIUM IN THE SEVENTH- AND EARLY EIGHTH-CENTURY SECTIONS OF THE LIBER PONTIFICALIS
McKitterick, R. D. (2016) · Papers of the British School at Rome · doi:10.1017/s0068246216000076 · Cited by 77
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McKitterick, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McKitterick, Rosamond
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2008-04-24
- OpenAlex
- W4256064226
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 54.29
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval History and Crusades
- Keywords
- Charlemagne, Carolingian dynasty, Carolingian Empire, Frankish kingdom, Carolingian court, royal household, Carolingian historiography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review