The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Culture, ideology, and strategic framing
Abstract
The recent focus on the strategic framing of injustice and grievances, their causes, motivations, and associated templates for collective action, has served to reemphasize the central importance of ideas and cultural elements in understanding the mobilization of participation in social movements and the framing of political opportunity. While conceiving of culture and framing as strategically produced represents a substantial break with past conceptions of ideas in movements, which tended to emphasize their embeddedness in community and as crescively emergent, still the notion of strategic framing is quite vague in terms of its constituent elements and general processes. This introduction to Part III focuses first on the larger evolution of the analysis of ideas and culture in academic scholarship and as it was entailed (or not) in the study of social movements. Recent decades have seen the emergence of modes of analysis of culture, of frames and scripts, of rhetoric and dramaturgy, and of cultural repertoires and tool kits that substantially enhance our ability to analyze the role of culture, ideology, and frames in social movements. The literature on culture and framing in social movements has been somewhat amorphous. I sketch six basic topics in the interplay of movements, framing, and the larger society. First, I discuss the cultural construction of repertoires of contention and frames . Second, since framing takes place in the context of larger societal processes, I discuss the contribution of cultural contradictions and historical events in providing opportunities for framing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
"It Was like a Fever ..." Narrative and Identity in Social Protest
Polletta, F. (1998) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3097241 · Cited by 528
McAdam, D., & Scott, W. R. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.003 · Cited by 516
Oliver, P. E., & Meyer, D. J. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210267 · Cited by 475
The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management
Pahl-Wostl, C., Tàbara, D., Bouwen, R., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Ridder, D., & Taillieu, T. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007 · Cited by 346
BONILLA, T., & TILLERY, A. B. (2020) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055420000544 · Cited by 113
PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE AMONG NATIONALLY FEDERATED SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · Social Movements and Organization Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791000.011 · Cited by 37
Investigating global mental health: contributions from political science
Patterson, A. S., Boadu, N. Y., Clark, M., Janes, C., Monteiro, N., Roberts, J. H., Shiffman, J., Thomas, D., & Wipfli, H. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1724315 · Cited by 15
Pesqueira, L., Glasbergen, P., & Leroy, P. (2020) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21395 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Zald, M. N.
- Venue
- Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1996-01-26
- Pages
- 261-274
- OpenAlex
- W2490332429
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 63.23
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.