The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gendering culture: towards a plural perspective on Kwena women's rights
Abstract
This chapter adopts a gendered perspective on rights and culture which highlights how women and men negotiate their procreative relationships and the claims that arise from this in daily life in Botswana. Based on research carried out in the village of Molepolole between 1982 and 1989, it is a local-level ethnographic study focused on the concrete and specific ways in which gender frames the relations of power up on which negotiations concerning family relationships among Bakwena are founded, through social actors' perspectives and experiences. It thus is aligned with the shift from conceptions of ‘culture’ as representing a static, homogenous, coherent unity to a view of culture as practice, embedded in local contexts and in the multiple realities of everyday life (Bourdieu 1977; Sahlins 1976; Strathern 1980). This framework, which conceives of culture as an ongoing process, allows us to acknowledge heterogeneity in the social and legal practices shaping people's worlds and their relationship with rights (see Merry, in this volume). We may then bring together for consideration culture, rights and law in ways that undermine simple dichotomies between rights and culture. Law, culture and rights: an ethnographic perspective By taking account of the specificities of people's lives, my analysis reinforces the perspective on the relationship between culture, rights and law, that reorients the debate on human rights away from universalist/relativist polarizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In centrist models of legal pluralism, customary law comes not only to have a static and over systemic character, but also an overly legal one.”
From Policy Discourses on Women's Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Implications of the Re-turn to the Customary (2003) · cites this paper as Griffiths 2001
Citations
Cited by
Whitehead, A., & Tsikata, D. (2003) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/1471-0366.00051 · Cited by 457
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, A.
- Venue
- Culture and Rights
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-11-29
- Pages
- 102-126
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.