The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Firearms: A Global History to 1700
Abstract
This book is a history of firearms across the world from the 1100s up to the 1700s, from their invention in China to the time when European firearms had become clearly superior. It asks why it was the Europeans who perfected firearms when it was the Chinese who had invented them, and answers this question by looking at how firearms were used throughout the world. Early firearms were restricted to infantry and siege warfare, limiting their use outside of Europe and Japan. Steppe and desert nomads imposed a different style of warfare on the Middle East, India, and China – a style with which firearms were incompatible. By the time that better firearms allowed these regions to turn the tables on the nomads, Japan's self-imposed isolation left Europe with no rival in firearms design, production, or use, with consequences that are still with us today.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, as shown above, Yi's argument is conditional: musketeers fail in open fields without reliance upon 'a fortress or rough geography.'”
From Big Heads and Buddhist Demons: The Korean Musketry Revolution and the Northern Expeditions of 1654 and 1658 (2014) · cites this paper as Chase 2003.
In the citing paper
“Chase argues that firearms development lagged in East Asia because early guns, due to their slow rate of fire and low accuracy, had little investment return when fired against nomadic cavalry.”
From Big Heads and Buddhist Demons: The Korean Musketry Revolution and the Northern Expeditions of 1654 and 1658 (2014) · cites this paper as Chase 2003, 1-23, 207-10.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–222 of 222
TARİHİN TEK MERKEZLİLİĞİ VE MİTİN İNŞASI: AVRUPAMERKEZCİ TARİH YAZIMINI YENİDEN DÜŞÜNMEK
Kılıç, C. (2026) · Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute · doi:10.30794/pausbed.1755937
Turnus in India—The Figure of Khwaja Safar in Corte-Real’s Second Siege of Diu
Gorey, M. M. (2025) · Classical Receptions Journal · doi:10.1093/crj/claf013
Réactions multi composants et essais d’accès à de nouveaux pentazoles
Narboni, C. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/59f12650zcfcez4ac7zbf30zd458583f48c3
La chasse aux trophées : menace ou alliée pour les espèces rares
Palazy, L. (2013) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6a815b48z6428z4c18z9d8az222479545410
Les Mamelouks et la guerre : stratégie, tactique et idéologie (1250-1375)
Berriah, M. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/0389d58dzd550z479ez926ezea1026a3e5ba
Les hommes face à la guerre : regards croisés sur les guerres austro-ottomanes au XVIIe siècle
Bardakçı, Ö. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/c04fba4cz87daz4ef9z8d76z37a8f248c5d4
The survival of the Chinese handgun in the late Ming, c. 1550–1644
Noordam, B. (2026) · International Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s147959142610076x
Portuguese handheld firearms in Asia in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries
de Jesus, R. L., & Murteira, A. (2026) · International Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s1479591426100849
Circulation of Military Technology in the Medieval Middle East
France, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198969631.003.0004
Asia’s Ancient Mediterranean Littoral as a Military Contact Zone
Fissel, M. C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198969631.003.0023
Warfare, Commerce, and European Imperialism in South-East Asia
Wellen, K. A. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198969631.003.0018
Gunpowder and Ottoman Expansion
Streusand, D. E. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198969631.003.0005
Ecologies of War in the Mughal Empire
Nath, P. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198969631.003.0002
Introduction: the reception of the harquebus in East and South-East Asia
Noordam, B. (2026) · International Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s1479591426100886
Weapons, Wealth, and the Fates of SocietiesPreprint
Lee, S., Passivirta, I., & Zentefis, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6482759
Xin, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54691/h9ptw631
Stanley, M. E. (2007) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)
The Development of Projectile Weapons 2: Firearms
Forge, J. (2012) · Research ethics forum · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5736-3_4
Metadata
- Authors
- Chase, K.
- Corresponding author
- Chase, Kenneth
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2003-07-07
- OpenAlex
- W4252404275
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Military history and social perspectives
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Keywords
- firearms history, gunpowder weapons, siege warfare, infantry weapons, nomadic warfare, steppe nomads, early modern warfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review