Cited by 672Linguistics and language evolutionHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesLinguistics and Language Studies

Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction

Clackson, James·2007·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

The Indo-European language family consists of many of the modern and ancient languages of Europe, India and Central Asia, including Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, Russian, German, French, Spanish and English. Spoken by an estimated three billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European languages. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their classification, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points, and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European languages for the first time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511808616

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Roots that build Pres. stems to the exclusion of (root-)Aor. stems tend to have 'atelic' actionality (activities and states, [-change-of-state]).

    “It has frequently been noticed in the literature (e.g., Clackson 2007: 134, Dahl 2010: 111-16 (cf. 104), Willi 2018: 425-32; cf. Delbrück 1897: 74-82) that roots that build Pres. stems to the exclusion of (root-)Aor. stems tend to have 'atelic' actionality (i.e., they are activities and states, which have the feature [change-of-state ], as discussed above).”

    From New Approach to Prohibitive Constructions in the R̥gveda and the Atharvaveda (2021) · cites this paper as Clackson 2007: 134

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clackson, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Clackson, James
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2007-10-18
OpenAlex
W4251828327
Cited by
672
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
55.66
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Studies
Keywords
Indo-European languages, historical linguistics, language classification, comparative analysis, linguistic typology, Sanskrit, Latin language, Greeks, Russian, German, French language, Spanish language, English language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review