The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Software for Social Network Analysis
Abstract
Introduction This chapter reviews software for the analysis of social networks. Both commercial and freely available packages are considered. Based on the software page on the INSNA website (http://www.insna.org/INSNA/soft inf.html), and using the main topics in the book on network analysis by Wasserman and Faust (1994), which we regard as the standard text, we selected twenty-seven software packages: twenty-three stand-alone programs, listed in Table 13.1.1, and five utility toolkits given in Table 13.1.2. Software merely aimed at visualization of networks was not admitted to the list because this is the topic of Chapter 12 of this book (Freeman 2004). We do review a few programs with strong visualization properties. Some were originally developed for network visualization, and now contain analysis procedures (e.g., NetDraw; Borgatti 2002). Other programs were specifically developed to integrate network analysis and visualization (e.g., NetMiner, Cyram 2004, and visone; Brandes and Wagner 2003). Two other programs for network visualization are worth mentioning here because some of the reviewed software packages have export functions to these graph drawing programs, or they are freely distributed together with the social analysis software: KrackPlot (Krackhardt, Blythe, and McGrath 1994) and Mage (Richardson 2001). The age of the software was not a criterion for selection, although the release dates of the last versions of the majority of the reviewed software were within the last one or two years. Tables 13.1.1 and 13.1.2 describe the main objective or characteristic of each program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Cited by
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
Social Networks and Health: Models, Methods, and Applications
Valente, T. W. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.001.0001 · Cited by 933
Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis*
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x · Cited by 770
Everton, S. F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139136877 · Cited by 277
A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks
Foltête, J.-C., Clauzel, C., & Vuidel, G. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.07.002 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Huisman, M., & van Duijn, M. A. J.
- Venue
- Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2005-02-07
- Pages
- 270-316
- OpenAlex
- W2491663862
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software for Social Network Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511811395.013
- The paper
- Huisman, M., & van Duijn, M. A. J. (2005). Software for Social Network Analysis. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811395.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.