The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Past, Present and Future
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After the adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (‘UDHR’), which included a relatively full catalogue of human rights, the UN General Assembly instructed the Commission on Human Rights to commence the drafting of a single covenant on human rights. While the drafting of a treaty covering civil and political rights was completed in short time, disagreement over whether to include economic, social and cultural rights led the Economic and Social Council (‘ECOSOC’) to request guidance from the General Assembly. The General Assembly initially ordered the Commission to produce one covenant but later reversed its position due to mediocre drafting progress, further prompting from ECOSOC and opposition of some Western States to economic, social and cultural rights. In 1966, it approved the adoption of two Covenants: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (‘ICCPR’) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the ‘Covenant’ or ‘ICESCR’), the latter lacking a complaints mechanism. Two decades after this schism, the ‘renaissance’ of economic, social and cultural rights (‘ESC rights’) is partly attributable to the pioneering work of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (‘the Committee’). Established in 1987, the Committee has developed a ‘jurisprudence’ through its general comments and State-specific concluding observations. This work has been influential and catalytic in helping develop the conceptual framework of economic, social and cultural rights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Constitutional Rights
Alexy, R., & Rivers, J. (2002) · Cited by 1,244
Basic Water Requirements for Human Activities: Meeting Basic Needs
Gleick, P. H. (1996) · Water International · doi:10.1080/02508069608686494 · Cited by 1,164
Gleick, P. (1998) · Water Policy · doi:10.1016/s1366-7017(99)00008-2 · Cited by 498
Craven, M. C. R. (1995) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) · Cited by 449
From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation
Saith, A. (2006) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00518.x · Cited by 341
Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do
Ikenberry, G. J., & Sunstein, C. R. (2002) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20033095 · Cited by 321
Illegal cities : law and urban change in developing countries
Fernándes, E., & Varley, A. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 195
Non-Discrimination and Equality in the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies
Vandenhole, W. (2005) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 175
Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative LawPreprint
Freeman, J. (1999) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.165988 · Cited by 58
Cited by
Quantifying renewable groundwater stress with GRACE
Richey, A. S., Thomas, B. F., Lo, M., Reager, J. T., Famiglietti, J. S., Voss, K., Swenson, S., & Rodell, M. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2015wr017349 · Cited by 889
Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics
(2026) · Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics · doi:10.5897/jdae · Cited by 465
Gostin, L. O., Monahan, J. T., Kaldor, J., DeBartolo, M., Friedman, E. A., Gottschalk, K., Kim, S. C., Alwan, A., Binagwaho, A., Burci, G. L., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30233-8 · Cited by 338
Rights-based approaches to addressing food poverty and food insecurity in Ireland and UK
Dowler, E. A., & O’Connor, D. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.036 · Cited by 295
Right to property, inheritance, and contract and persons with mental illness
Bhugra, D., Pathare, S., Joshi, R., Nardodkar, R., Torales, J., Tolentino, E. J. L., Dantas, R., & Ventriglio, A. (2016) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2016.1210576 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Langford, M., & King, J. A.
- Venue
- Social Rights Jurisprudence
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-01-19
- Pages
- 477-516
- OpenAlex
- W1513073529
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 228.50
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Past, Present and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511815485.025
- The paper
- Langford, M., & King, J. A. (2009). Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Past, Present and Future. Social Rights Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815485.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.