The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-awareness in animals
Abstract
This chapter claims that the cumulative force of various empirical data and conceptual considerations makes it more reasonable to accept than to deny that many animals are self-aware. It considers studies focusing on animals' preferences. In the philosophy of mind, desires and beliefs are classified as propositional attitudes, mental states that take propositions or sentences as their objects. Desires to do certain things and intentional actions that involve doing them suggest at least some rudimentary awareness of oneself as persisting through time. Strengthening the case for intentional action, and therefore for bodily self-awareness, is evidence of more sophisticated behaviors in animals involving planning, complex problem-solving, and/or tool use. Like intentional action involving a plan, fear requires some awareness that one will continue into the future. Since Gordon Gallup's pioneering experiments, self-recognition with mirrors has often been cited as evidence of self-awareness in animals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Like all the other dimensions, this is a capacity that admits of gradations [60,61].”
From Dimensions of Animal Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition
Leary, S., Underwood, W. J., Anthony, R., Cartner, S. C., Corey, D. G., Grandin, T., Greenacre, C. B., Gwaltney-Bran, S., McCrackin, M. A., Meyer, R. E., et al. (2013) · Cited by 1,349
Dimensions of Animal Consciousness
Birch, J., Schnell, A. K., & Clayton, N. S. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.007 · Cited by 406
Ethical issues related to brain organoid research
Hyun, I., Scharf-Deering, J. C., & Lunshof, J. E. (2020) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146653 · Cited by 189
Science, sentience, and animal welfare
Jones, R. C. (2013) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-012-9351-1 · Cited by 119
Interspecies justice: agency, self-determination, and assent
Healey, R., & Pepper, A. (2020) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01472-5 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- DeGrazia, D.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeGrazia, David
- ORCID
- DeGrazia, David
- Venue
- The Philosophy of Animal Minds
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-09-03
- Pages
- 201-217
- OpenAlex
- W1630360875
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- animal self-awareness, mirror self-recognition, propositional attitudes, intentional action, body awareness, animal preferences, animal cognition, tool use, problem solving, fear, persistence of the self
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review