The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era
Abstract
This book explores the impact of economic crises and free-market reforms on party systems and political representation in contemporary Latin America. It explains why some patterns of market reform align and stabilize party systems, whereas other patterns of reform leave party systems vulnerable to widespread social protest and electoral instability. In contrast to other works on the topic, this book accounts for both the institutionalization and the breakdown of party systems, and it explains why Latin America turned to the Left politically in the aftermath of the market-reform process. Ultimately, it explains why this 'left turn' was more radical in some countries than others and why it had such varied effects on national party systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The transition to democracy and implementation of neoliberal governance created new struggles, among them being the issue of how to contend with differing notions of citizenship and rights (Roberts, 2014).”
From INSURGENT HERITAGE: Mobilizing Memory, Place‐based Care and Cultural Citizenships (2022) · cites this paper as Roberts, 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical Event Analysis in Case Study Research
García-Montoya, L., & Mahoney, J. (2023) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124120926201 · Cited by 62
INSURGENT HERITAGE: Mobilizing Memory, Place‐based Care and Cultural Citizenships
Novoa, M. (2022) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.13143 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, K. M.
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-12-18
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review