The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change
Abstract
Challenging the notion that digital media render traditional, formal organizations irrelevant, this book offers a new theory of collective action and organizing. Based on extensive surveys and interviews with members of three influential and distinctive organizations in the United States - The American Legion, AARP and MoveOn - the authors reconceptualize collective action as a phenomenon in which technology enhances people's ability to cross boundaries in order to interact with one another and engage with organizations. By developing a theory of Collective Action Space, Bimber, Flanagin and Stohl explore how people's attitudes, behaviors, motivations, goals and digital media use are related to their organizational involvement. They find that using technology does not necessarily make people more likely to act collectively, but contributes to a diversity of 'participatory styles', which hinge on people's interaction with one another and the extent to which they shape organizational agendas. In the digital media age, organizations do not simply recruit people into roles, they provide contexts in which people are able to construct their own collective experiences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Political communication research, in particular, has long described how alterations of networked communications technology appear to impact social movements, institutional politics, and political participation”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [133]
In the citing paper
“Online and offline forces that impact collective behavior and action are inextricable”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [133]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661 · Cited by 3,116
The Personalization of Politics
Bennett, W. L. (2012) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716212451428 · Cited by 947
“Bimber, Flanagin, and Stohl (2012) have also found that the relationships between individuals and civic organizations are becoming more entrepreneurial and less centrally manageable, resulting in changes in the way communication is involved in organizing collectivities.”
BackgroundSocial Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First
Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161212471716 · Cited by 511
“…this new technology appears able to provide a movement with powerful, speedy, and relatively low-cost tools for recruitment, fund-raising, the distribution of information and images, collective discussions, and mobilization for action (Bennett 2006; Bimber et al. 2005, 2012; Earl and Kimport 2011).”
BackgroundBrennen, J. S., & Kreiss, D. (2016) · The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy · doi:10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect111 · Cited by 527
Kavada, A. (2015) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1043318 · Cited by 440
Metadata
- Authors
- Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-02-29
- OpenAlex
- W4255002177
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 19.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Keywords
- collective action, organizing, digital media, organizational involvement, American Legion, AARP, online political participation, technology and organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review