Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination
Abstract
Now available to an English-speaking audience, this book presents a groundbreaking theoretical analysis of memory, identity and culture. It investigates how cultures remember, arguing that human memory exists and is communicated in two ways, namely inter-human interaction and in external systems of notation, such as writing, which can span generations. Dr Assmann defines two theoretical concepts of cultural memory, differentiating between the long-term memory of societies, which can span up to 3,000 years, and communicative memory, which is typically restricted to 80 to 100 years. He applies this theoretical framework to case studies of four specific cultures, illustrating the function contexts and specific achievements, including the state, international law, religion and science. Ultimately, his research demonstrates that memory is not simply a means of retaining information, but rather a force that can shape cultural identity and allow cultures to respond creatively to both daily challenges and catastrophic changes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authorship in folklore is inherently collaborative and iterative, shaped by communal memory and lived experience rather than fixed ownership.
“Authorship in folklore is inherently collaborative and iterative, shaped by communal memory and lived experience rather than fixed ownership.”
From Algorithmic Storytelling and Vernacular Folklore: Rewriting the Nenek Pakande Monster in the Age of Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Assmann, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“XI SHUAI” 蟋蟀 (“CRICKET”) AND ITS CONSEQUENCES: ISSUES IN EARLY CHINESE POETRY AND TEXTUAL STUDIES
Kern, M. (2019) · Early China · doi:10.1017/eac.2019.1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Makhortykh, M. (2023) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/17506980231202849 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Levine, A. D. (2014) · The Medieval History Journal · doi:10.1177/0971945814545007 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Saing, M. E. (2026) · Discourses on Culture · doi:10.2478/doc-2026-0010
Reclaiming Heritage Through the Image of Traditional Habitat
Mozaffari, A., & Westbrook, N. (2017) · The Making of Islamic Heritage · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4071-9_4
Bayrak, T. (2026) · İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.15869/itobiad.1769534
- Authors
- Assmann, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Assmann, Jan
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2011-12-05
- OpenAlex
- W4232815802
- Cited by
- 1,589
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 490 · 2025: 245 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature and Cultural Memory
- Keywords
- cultural memory, communicative memory, long-term memory, writing systems, cultural identity, memory and culture, ancient civilizations, state formation, international law, religion, science, Assmann
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review