Cited by 27Particle physics theoretical and experimental studiesCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications

The fine-tuning problems of particle physics and anthropic mechanisms

Donoghue, John F.·2007·Universe or Multiverse?

Abstract

Open questions in particle physics Each field has a set of questions which are universally viewed as important, and these questions motivate much of the work in the field. In particle physics, several of these questions are directly related to experimental problems. Examples include questions such as: Does the Higgs boson exist and, if so, what is its mass? What is the nature of the dark matter in the Universe? What is the mechanism that generated the net number of baryons in the Universe? For these topics, there is a well posed problem related to experimental findings or theoretical predictions. These are problems that must be solved if we are to achieve a complete understanding of the fundamental theory. There also exists a different set of questions which have a more aesthetic character. In these cases, it is not as clear that a resolution is required, yet the problems motivate a search for certain classes of theories. Examples of these are the three ‘naturalness’ or ‘fine-tuning’ problems of the Standard Model; these are associated with the cosmological constant Λ, the energy scale of electroweak symmetry-breaking ν and the strong CP-violating angle θ . As will be explained more fully below, these are free parameters in the Standard Model that seem to have values 10 to 120 orders of magnitude smaller than their natural values and smaller than the magnitude of their quantum corrections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781107050990.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is unlikely that there is a technically natural resolution to the cosmological constant's fine-tuning problem.

    “For example, Donoghue (2007) says 'It is unlikely that there is technically natural resolution to the cosmological constant's fine-tuning problem -this would require new physics at 10 À3 eV.[Such attempts are] highly contrived to have new dynamics at this extremely low scale which modifies only gravity and not the other interactions.'”

    From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Donoghue (2007)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donoghue, J. F.
Corresponding author
Donoghue, John F.
Venue
Universe or Multiverse?
Published
2007-06-21
Pages
231-246
OpenAlex
W3090262325
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Keywords
fine-tuning problem, anthropic principle, naturalness, cosmological constant, electroweak scale, strong CP problem, Standard Model, Higgs boson mass, dark matter, baryogenesis, quantum corrections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review