The fine-tuning problems of particle physics and anthropic mechanisms
Abstract
Open questions in particle physics Each field has a set of questions which are universally viewed as important, and these questions motivate much of the work in the field. In particle physics, several of these questions are directly related to experimental problems. Examples include questions such as: Does the Higgs boson exist and, if so, what is its mass? What is the nature of the dark matter in the Universe? What is the mechanism that generated the net number of baryons in the Universe? For these topics, there is a well posed problem related to experimental findings or theoretical predictions. These are problems that must be solved if we are to achieve a complete understanding of the fundamental theory. There also exists a different set of questions which have a more aesthetic character. In these cases, it is not as clear that a resolution is required, yet the problems motivate a search for certain classes of theories. Examples of these are the three ‘naturalness’ or ‘fine-tuning’ problems of the Standard Model; these are associated with the cosmological constant Λ, the energy scale of electroweak symmetry-breaking ν and the strong CP-violating angle θ . As will be explained more fully below, these are free parameters in the Standard Model that seem to have values 10 to 120 orders of magnitude smaller than their natural values and smaller than the magnitude of their quantum corrections.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is unlikely that there is a technically natural resolution to the cosmological constant's fine-tuning problem.
“For example, Donoghue (2007) says 'It is unlikely that there is technically natural resolution to the cosmological constant's fine-tuning problem -this would require new physics at 10 À3 eV.[Such attempts are] highly contrived to have new dynamics at this extremely low scale which modifies only gravity and not the other interactions.'”
From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Donoghue (2007)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life
Barnes, L. A. (2012) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as12015 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“For example, Donoghue (2007) says ‘It is unlikely that there is technically natural resolution to the cosmological constant’s fine-tuning problem — this would require new physics at 10 3 eV.”
BackgroundConstraints on the variability of quark masses from nuclear binding
Damour, T., & Donoghue, J. F. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.014014 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Donoghue, J. F.
- Corresponding author
- Donoghue, John F.
- ORCID
- Donoghue, John F.
- Venue
- Universe or Multiverse?
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2007-06-21
- Pages
- 231-246
- OpenAlex
- W3090262325
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
- Keywords
- fine-tuning problem, anthropic principle, naturalness, cosmological constant, electroweak scale, strong CP problem, Standard Model, Higgs boson mass, dark matter, baryogenesis, quantum corrections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review