Cited by 20Historical Economic and Social StudiesEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic Theory and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epilogue: British economic growth, 1270–1870

Stephen Broadberry, Bruce Campbell, Alexander Klein, Mark Overton, Bas van Leeuwen·2014·British Economic Growth, 1270–1870

Abstract

Introduction Between 1270 and 1870 Britain slowly progressed from the periphery of the European economy to centre-stage of an integrated world economy. In the process it escaped from Malthusian constraints and by the eighteenth century had successfully reconciled rising population with rising living standards. This final chapter reflects upon this protracted but profound economic transformation from the perspective of the national income estimates assembled in Part I and analysed in Part II of this book. Because Britain’s economic rise did not unfold in isolation, account is taken of the broader comparative context provided by the national income reconstructions now available for several other Eurasian countries: Spain from 1282, Italy from 1310 and Holland from 1348, plus Japan from 725, China from 980 and India from 1600. All are output-based estimates but have been derived via a range of alternative approaches according to the nature of the available historical evidence. Several make ingenious use of real wage rates and urbanisation ratios (Malanima, 2011; Álvarez-Nogal and Prados de la Escosura, 2013), two economic indicators often used as surrogates for estimates of GDP per head. Only the GDP estimates for Holland, like these for Britain, have been made the hard way, by summing the weighted value-added outputs of the agricultural, industrial and service sectors and then dividing the results by estimates of total population obtained by reconciling time-series and cross-se…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781107707603.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Slow but persistent output growth across a broad range of industrial sectors was under way by the late seventeenth century.

    “First, Broadberry et al. (2015) have demonstrated that slow but persistent output growth across a broad range of industrial sectors was under way by the late seventeenth century.”

    From The Mechanics of the Industrial Revolution (2023) · cites this paper as Broadberry et al. (2015)

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M., & van Leeuwen, B.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
British Economic Growth, 1270–1870
Published
2014-12-31
Pages
402-428
OpenAlex
W2483814017
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
Keywords
British economic growth, economic transformation, global economic integration, comparative economic history, real wages, urbanization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review