The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological assessment
Abstract
This chapter reviews conceptual issues and definitions of the executive function. It is argued that executive function is a multidimensional construct and it is suggested that subspecialists in Behavioral neurology (BN) & Neuropsychiatry (NP) regard executive function principally as a cognitive domain. Executive function requires the integrated actions of the frontal-subcortical circuits, open-loop connections to other neocortical areas, limbic and paralimbic structures, thalamic nuclei, pontocerebellar networks, modulatory neurochemical projections from mesencephalic and ventral forebrain structures, and the white matter connections within and between all of these areas. As such, executive dysfunction is more accurately understood as dysfunction within or across these networks. The distributed structural and functional anatomy of executive function renders it vulnerable to disruption by many conditions affecting the brain. Finally, the chapter briefly discusses neuropsychological tests and bedside assessments of executive function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Cited by
Cognitive function following a major depressive episode: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Semkovska, M., Quinlivan, L., O'Grady, T., Johnson, R., Collins, A., O'Connor, J., Knittle, H., Ahern, E., & Gload, T. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30291-3 · Cited by 631
Impact of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial on cortical and hippocampal volumes
Carlson, M. C., Kuo, J. H., Chuang, Y., Varma, V. R., Harris, G., Albert, M. S., Erickson, K. I., Kramer, A. F., Parisi, J. M., Xue, Q., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.005 · Cited by 197
A review of binge eating disorder and obesity
Agüera, Z., Lozano-Madrid, M., Mallorquí-Bagué, N., Jiménez-Murcia, S., Menchón, J. M., & Fernández-Aranda, F. (2021) · neuropsychiatrie · doi:10.1007/s40211-020-00346-w · Cited by 144
New landscape of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
Frisoni, G. B., Hansson, O., Nichols, E., Garibotto, V., Schindler, S. E., van der Flier, W. M., Jessen, F., Villain, N., Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Crivelli, L., et al. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01294-2 · Cited by 143
Ott, C. V., Bjertrup, A. J., Jensen, J. H., Ullum, H., Sjælland, R., Purdon, S. E., Vieta, E., Kessing, L. V., & Miskowiak, K. W. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.059 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Cullum, C. M.
- Venue
- Behavioral Neurology & Neuropsychiatry
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2013-02-05
- Pages
- 394-405
- OpenAlex
- W1510366994
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 116.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9781139016919.026
- The paper
- Cullum, C. M. (2013). Neuropsychological assessment. Behavioral Neurology & Neuropsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139016919.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
