The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Making Democratic Governance Work: How Regimes Shape Prosperity, Welfare, and Peace
Abstract
Is democratic governance good for economic prosperity? Does it accelerate progress towards social welfare and human development? Does it generate a peace-dividend and reduce conflict at home? Within the international community, democracy and governance are widely advocated as intrinsically desirable goals. Nevertheless, alternative schools of thought dispute their consequences and the most effective strategy for achieving critical developmental objectives. This book argues that both liberal democracy and state capacity need to be strengthened to ensure effective development, within the constraints posed by structural conditions. Liberal democracy allows citizens to express their demands, hold public officials to account and rid themselves of ineffective leaders. Yet rising public demands that cannot be met by the state generate disillusionment with incumbent officeholders, the regime, or ultimately the promise of liberal democracy ideals. Thus governance capacity also plays a vital role in advancing human security, enabling states to respond effectively to citizen's demands.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As suggested by Norris (2012), more equal societies are determined by a combination of political institutions and a well-functioning state apparatus.”
From Income inequality in authoritarian regimes: the role of political institutions and state capacity (2023) · cites this paper as Norris, 2012
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barro, R. J. (1996) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1007/bf00163340 · Cited by 1,910
Why Electoral Integrity Matters
Norris, P. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107280861 · Cited by 583
Self-citationConceptualizing energy democracy
Szulecki, K. (2017) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294 · Cited by 520
Glass, L.-M., & Newig, J. (2019) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031 · Cited by 498
Democracy and Bureaucracy: How their Quality Matters for Popular Satisfaction
Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2013) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.830468 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Norris, P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Norris, Pippa
- ORCID
- Norris, Pippa
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-08-27
- OpenAlex
- W4240767335
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
- Keywords
- democratic governance, liberal democracy, state capacity, economic development, social welfare, human development, peace dividend, political conflict, human security, public accountability, structural constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review