The socialization of cognition: What's involved?
Abstract
The title of this chapter sets out a topic (the socialization of cognition) and asks a question (what is involved?). To introduce my answer, and to explain what I mean by the socialization of cognition, I start by differentiating between psychologists' approaches to the study of social development and to the study of cognitive development. From the beginning the study of social development reflected a strong interest in the acquisition of values or value-laden qualities: honesty, reponsibility, empathy, friendliness, healthy adjustment, prosocial behavior. It also pointed to the social environment as the main factor in the acquisition of these qualities. What came later was an interest in skills and strategies – the skills needed, for instance, to enter a social group, make friends, ask for help, or refuse a request without disastrous consequences. Often as an accompaniment to the interest in skills and strategies (although not dictated by it), there appeared as well an interest in the effect of internal factors, with a particular emphasis on the unfolding of cognitive capacity – the capacity, for instance, to take the perspective of another, to judge interactions, or to estimate the consequences of an action. In contrast, the study of cognitive development reflected from the start an interest in skills and strategies, and in capacities that unfolded with age. Interest in the impact of the social environment was slow to develop, as was the recognition that cognitive development is marked by the acquisition of values.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals engage actively in the process of determining the worth of what they experience and how they might engage with it and learn from it.
“Instead, individuals engage actively in the process of determining the worth of what they experience and how they might engage with it and learn from it (Goodnow 1990).”
From Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments (2004) · cites this paper as Goodnow 1990
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments
Billett, S. (2004) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665620410550295 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
The Metaphor of Scaffolding: Its Utility for the Field of Learning Disabilities
Stone, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949803100404 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Learning and the development of social identities in the subjects Care and Technology
Volman, M., & Ten Dam, G. (2007) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920701656985 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goodnow, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Goodnow, Jacqueline J.
- Venue
- Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-01-26
- Pages
- 259-286
- OpenAlex
- W1860160737
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- social development (developmental psychology), cognitive development, value acquisition, social skills, social environment, perspective taking, prosocial behavior, socialization theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review